hamop is a Python package for computing what electrons do in a
material or molecule described by a tight-binding model: a short
list of orbitals and the energies that let an electron hop between
them. You build the model once. From that one model the package
computes:
- the allowed electron energies (the band structure) and how many states sit at each energy (the density of states);
- how strongly the material absorbs light at each photon energy (the optical conductivity);
- how easily electrons pass through a small device placed between two wires (the transmission);
- topological numbers such as the Chern number, and related geometric quantities of the electron states.
The point of the package is that all of these come from the same
matrices. When the optics and the energy levels of one model are
computed by different codes, small differences in conventions (how
the velocity is defined, how overlapping orbitals are treated, how
peaks are broadened) can make the results disagree, for example an
absorption edge that no longer sits at the band gap. Here the
spectrum and the optics are computed from the same Bloch matrices
through the same eigensolver, the topology functions work from the
same hopping blocks, and principal_layers cuts the same model into
the layer blocks that the transport functions take.
The package also works when neighbouring orbitals overlap (a nonorthogonal basis, as in LCAO calculations, which build electron states from atomic orbitals), and it can read Hamiltonians exported by Wannier90, a widely used program that turns first-principles (quantum-mechanical, parameter-free) calculations into tight-binding models. It ships no material data: the numbers of a real material come from your own calculation or measurement.
- A short guide to the words used here
- Install, units and conventions
- Examples (each with the output it prints)
- What is in the package
- When it refuses, and why
- How the results are checked
- Bugs fixed in 0.10.1
- Limits
- Relation to existing tools
- Where it comes from
- Citing, support and license
- Site, orbital -- an atom (site) carries one or more orbitals, the states an electron can occupy there.
- Hopping -- the energy that couples an orbital on one site to an orbital on another. You give each coupling once, in one direction; the reverse direction is added for you.
- Hermitian -- a matrix equal to its own conjugate transpose. An energy matrix must be Hermitian so that its energies are real; the reverse hopping added for you is the "Hermitian partner" of the one you give.
- Overlap, nonorthogonal basis -- in some models neighbouring
orbitals are not independent: they overlap by an amount
s. The overlap matrix is calledS. If you give no overlap,Sis the identity (an orthogonal basis). - Periodic model, unit cell -- a crystal repeats one unit cell.
The package handles periodicity in any number of directions, and
also finite models (a molecule, a flake, a device) with no
repetition (
cell=None). - Wave vector k, Brillouin zone, k-mesh -- in a crystal each
electron state carries a wave vector
k. All distinctkfill one cell of "k-space" called the Brillouin zone. Many results are sums over an even grid ofkpoints, the k-mesh (mesh=in the functions). - Bloch Hamiltonian H(k) -- the model's energy matrix at one
k. Its eigenvalues are the band energies at thatk. - Band structure, band gap -- the band energies as
kvaries. A gap is an energy range with no states. - Density of states (DOS) -- how many states lie near each energy.
- Chemical potential
mu, filling -- states belowmuare occupied (smoothly, at temperatureT); the filling is the number of occupied states per cell. - Optical conductivity -- how strongly light of photon energy
hbar omegais absorbed. It is computed with the Kubo-Greenwood formula (the standard weak-field response formula) and returned in units ofe^2/(4 hbar). That unit is the measured absorption plateau of graphene, so graphene gives about 1. - Broadening
eta-- a small energy width given to each sharp line, so that sums over a finite k-mesh give smooth curves. - Drude weight -- the part of the conductivity carried by freely moving electrons in a metal (the "intraband" part).
- Transmission T(E) -- the number of electron channels that pass
through a device at energy
E; in the Landauer picture the conductance is this number timese^2/hper spin. The device sits between two semi-infinite leads (wires), and is cut into principal layers that couple only to their nearest neighbours. The method is the nonequilibrium Green function (NEGF) method. - Green function -- the matrix
(zS - H)^-1at the complex energyz = E + i eta. Its imaginary part gives the local density of states (the DOS on each orbital, LDOS), and the transmission is built from it. - Self-energy -- a term added to a layer's Hamiltonian that describes what the rest of the system (a lead, disorder, a probe) does to it.
- Zeeman term, spin-orbit coupling -- energy terms that act on
the electron's spin: the Zeeman term comes from a magnetic field and
splits each level by
2B(Bin eV); spin-orbit coupling comes from the electron's own motion. - Berry phase, Chern number -- properties of how the electron
states change as
kmoves. The Chern number is a whole number that cannot change unless a band gap closes. It sets the quantized Hall conductivityC e^2/h. - Quantum metric -- how fast the occupied electron states change
as
kmoves; the Berry curvature is its partner. - Kernel polynomial method (KPM) -- a way to get the DOS and the conductivity of very large finite models without computing every eigenvalue.
pip install hamop
It needs Python 3.9 or newer, NumPy 1.22 or newer and SciPy 1.8 or newer, and nothing else.
Units and conventions, stated once:
- Energies in eV, positions in Angstrom,
kin 1/Angstrom, all Cartesian. TemperaturesTare in kelvin, exceptberry_dipole, which takeskTin energy units. - Each directed hopping block is added once; its Hermitian partner is implied.
- The optical conductivity is the real sheet conductivity in units of
e^2/(4 hbar). Spin degeneracy enters as an explicit factorspin(default 2). For a model made spinful withwith_spin, passspin=1. For a finite model the result is the conductivity times the system area; divide by your geometric area. doscounts states per unit cell per eV without spin;fermi_leveltakes the filling without spin;carrier_countincludes spin.- The velocity operator uses the usual tight-binding position
convention: the position operator is diagonal at the sites. Extra
on-site position blocks (
model.set_dipole) add the intra-atomic term on top. - Magnetic flux for
with_peierlsis given per square Angstrom, in units of the flux quantum;magnetic_supercelltakes the fluxp/qper unit cell.
Each example below runs as written, and the output shown is what it printed with hamop 0.10.1. The model parameters are illustrative values, not fitted to any material, unless the text says otherwise.
import numpy as np
from hamop import graphene, bands, sigma_optical
g = graphene(t=-2.7, a=2.46) # hopping t in eV, lattice constant a in Angstrom
b = 2 * np.pi * np.linalg.inv(g.cell).T # reciprocal lattice vectors (rows)
K = (2 * b[0] + b[1]) / 3 # a corner of the Brillouin zone
e_gamma = bands(g, [np.zeros(2)])[0]
e_K = bands(g, [K])[0]
print(f"band energies at the zone centre: {e_gamma[0]:+.4f} {e_gamma[1]:+.4f} eV")
print("gap at the zone corner K below 1e-9 eV:", abs(e_K[1] - e_K[0]) < 1e-9)
omega = np.array([1.0, 1.3]) # photon energies, eV
sigma = sigma_optical(g, omega, mu=0.0, mesh=120, eta=0.12, T=10.0)
for w, s in zip(omega, sigma):
print(f"photon {w:.1f} eV: sigma = {s:.3f} x e^2/(4 hbar)")band energies at the zone centre: -8.1000 +8.1000 eV
gap at the zone corner K below 1e-9 eV: True
photon 1.0 eV: sigma = 1.020 x e^2/(4 hbar)
photon 1.3 eV: sigma = 1.032 x e^2/(4 hbar)
The two bands sit at -/+ 3|t| at the zone centre and touch at the
corner K (the "Dirac point"). The absorption is close to 1 in units of
e^2/(4 hbar), the universal optical conductivity of graphene
(Kuzmenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117401 (2008)). The test suite
checks these two photon energies to within 5 %. The script
examples/graphene_universal_conductivity.py prints the same quantity
from 0.6 to 1.8 eV.
import numpy as np
from hamop import TightBindingModel, band_edges, berry_phase
def ssh_chain(t1, t2, a=2.0):
"""Two sites per cell, at 0 and a/2; hopping t1 inside the cell,
t2 to the next cell."""
m = TightBindingModel(positions=[[0.0], [0.5 * a]], norb=1, cell=[[a]])
m.add_hop(0, 1, (0,), [[t1]]) # site 0 -> site 1, same cell
m.add_hop(1, 0, (1,), [[t2]]) # site 1 -> site 0, next cell
return m
for t1, t2 in [(-1.0, -0.6), (-0.6, -1.0)]:
m = ssh_chain(t1, t2)
vbm, cbm, gap = band_edges(m, mu=0.0, mesh=2001)
b = 2 * np.pi / 2.0 # reciprocal period
loop = [[b * i / 60] for i in range(60)] # one pass through k
zak = berry_phase(m, loop, n_occ=1)
print(f"t1={t1:+.1f} t2={t2:+.1f}: gap {gap:.4f} eV, "
f"Zak phase {zak / np.pi:+.4f} pi")t1=-1.0 t2=-0.6: gap 0.8000 eV, Zak phase +0.0000 pi
t1=-0.6 t2=-1.0: gap 0.8000 eV, Zak phase -1.0000 pi
This is the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain. Both orderings of the
bonds have the same gap, 2 | |t1| - |t2| |. They differ in the Berry
phase of the filled band (here called the Zak phase): the two values
differ by pi. Which of the two is 0 depends on where the unit cell
starts; the difference of pi does not.
import numpy as np
from hamop import haldane, chern_number, sigma_tensor
for mass in (0.0, 0.9):
h = haldane(t1=-1.0, t2=0.1, phi=np.pi / 2, m_ab=mass)
C = chern_number(h, mesh=18)
sxy = sigma_tensor(h, [0.0], mu=0.0, directions=(0, 1), mesh=48,
T=10.0, eta=1e-4, spin=1)[0]
hall = sxy.real * np.pi / 2 # e^2/h is 2/pi in the unit e^2/(4 hbar)
print(f"mass {mass}: Chern number {round(C, 6) + 0.0:+.6f}, "
f"sigma_xy(0) = {round(hall, 6) + 0.0:+.6f} e^2/h")mass 0.0: Chern number +1.000000, sigma_xy(0) = +1.000000 e^2/h
mass 0.9: Chern number +0.000000, sigma_xy(0) = +0.000000 e^2/h
The Haldane model (Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)) has a
topological phase (Chern number 1) and, when the sublattice energy
difference m_ab is large enough, an ordinary one (Chern number 0).
Two separate calculations agree: the Chern number from the band
states, and the Hall conductivity at zero frequency from the Kubo
formula. Their agreement is the TKNN relation (Thouless, Kohmoto,
Nightingale and den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)).
import numpy as np
from hamop import chain_lead_blocks, transmission
t, eps = -1.0, 0.8 # hopping and impurity energy, eV
H00, H01 = chain_lead_blocks(t=t) # one lead layer and its coupling
layers = [H00, H00 + eps, H00] # three device layers, impurity in the middle
coup = [H01, H01] # couplings between device layers
E = np.array([-1.2, 0.3, 1.5, 2.5])
T = transmission(E, layers, coup, H00, H01, eta=1e-8)
exact = np.where(np.abs(E) < 2, (4 - E**2) / ((4 - E**2) + eps**2), 0.0)
for e, a, b in zip(E, T, exact):
print(f"E = {e:+.1f} eV: T = {a:.6f} closed form {b:.6f}")E = -1.2 eV: T = 0.800000 closed form 0.800000
E = +0.3 eV: T = 0.859341 closed form 0.859341
E = +1.5 eV: T = 0.732218 closed form 0.732218
E = +2.5 eV: T = 0.000000 closed form 0.000000
A clean chain passes one channel (T = 1) at energies inside its band,
between -2|t| and +2|t|, and none outside. A single impurity of energy
eps reflects part of the wave; the closed form for this chain is
T = (4t^2 - E^2) / ((4t^2 - E^2) + eps^2). At 2.5 eV the energy is
outside the band, so nothing passes.
from hamop import linear_chain, drude_weight
# A chain whose neighbouring orbitals overlap (s = 0.2), half filled.
m1 = linear_chain(t=-1.0, e0=0.0, s=0.2)
D1 = drude_weight(m1, mu=0.0, mesh=800, T=100.0)
# The same chain with the energy zero moved by c = 5 eV. With overlap
# that shift is H -> H + c S, so the hopping changes by c * s as well.
c = 5.0
m2 = linear_chain(t=-1.0 + c * 0.2, e0=c, s=0.2)
D2 = drude_weight(m2, mu=c, mesh=800, T=100.0)
print(f"Drude weight, original zero: {D1:.8f}")
print(f"Drude weight, shifted zero: {D2:.8f}")
print("difference below 1e-10:", abs(D1 - D2) < 1e-10)Drude weight, original zero: 16.01338983
Drude weight, shifted zero: 16.01338983
difference below 1e-10: True
Where you put the zero of energy is a free choice, so no physical
result may depend on it. With overlapping orbitals, that only holds if
the velocity includes the overlap term
v = dH/dk - (E_n + E_m)/2 dS/dk, which the package uses for the Drude
weight, the optical conductivity and the conductivity tensor.
import numpy as np
from hamop import linear_chain, band_information, fit_bands
def build(theta): # theta = (t, e0), both in eV
return linear_chain(t=theta[0], e0=theta[1])
k = np.linspace(0.1, 3.0, 12)[:, None] # 12 measured k-points (1/Angstrom)
sigma = 0.03 # measurement error, eV
plan = band_information(build, [-1.0, 0.2], k, sigmas=sigma)
print("identifiable:", plan["identifiable"])
print("predicted error bars (eV):", np.round(plan["sigma"], 5))
# Illustrative "measured" data: the chain with t = -1.0, e0 = 0.2,
# plus seeded random noise of size sigma.
rng = np.random.default_rng(13)
measured = 0.2 + 2 * (-1.0) * np.cos(k[:, 0]) + sigma * rng.standard_normal(12)
fit = fit_bands(build, [-1.3, 0.5], k, measured, sigmas=sigma)
print("fitted (t, e0):", np.round(fit.theta, 4))
print("error bars:", np.round(fit.sigma, 5))
print(f"chi-squared {fit.chi2:.2f} for {fit.chi2_dof} degrees of freedom")identifiable: True
predicted error bars (eV): [0.0061 0.00866]
fitted (t, e0): [-1.0002 0.2087]
error bars: [0.0061 0.00866]
chi-squared 18.87 for 10 degrees of freedom
build is your own parameterization: any function that turns a list
of numbers into a model. Before measuring, band_information says
whether the planned k-points can tell the parameters apart and how
large the error bars will be; design_kpoints picks the most useful
k-points from a candidate list. fit_bands then fits the measured
energies and reports error bars from the standard least-squares
covariance.
import numpy as np
from hamop import haldane, quantum_geometric_tensor, quantum_weight
m = haldane(t1=-1.0, t2=0.1) # lattice constant 1 Angstrom
b = 2 * np.pi * np.linalg.inv(m.cell).T
K = (2 * b[0] + b[1]) / 3
Q = quantum_geometric_tensor(m, K) # at the zone corner
g = Q.real # quantum metric, Angstrom^2
omega = 2 * Q[0, 1].imag # Berry curvature, Angstrom^2
print(f"tr g = {np.trace(g):.4f}, 2 sqrt(det g) = "
f"{2 * np.sqrt(np.linalg.det(g)):.4f}, |Omega| = {abs(omega):.4f}")
out = quantum_weight(m, mesh=18) # integrated over the zone
print(f"tr K = {out['tr_K']:.4f}, Chern number from the same data = {out['chern']:.4f}")tr g = 1.3889, 2 sqrt(det g) = 1.3889, |Omega| = 1.3889
tr K = 1.1827, Chern number from the same data = 1.0000
At every k, tr g >= 2 sqrt(det g) >= |Omega| must hold; at this
point all three are equal to four decimals. Integrated over the zone
the same chain gives tr K >= |C| (Onishi and Fu, PRX 14, 011052
(2024)): here 1.1827 against a Chern number of 1.
import os, tempfile
import numpy as np
import hamop
# Write graphene's real-space Hamiltonian in the Wannier90 hr.dat format,
# read it back, and compare with the built-in graphene model.
t, a = -2.7, 2.46
H_R = {(0, 0): [[0, t], [t, 0]],
(1, 0): [[0, 0], [t, 0]], (-1, 0): [[0, t], [0, 0]],
(0, 1): [[0, 0], [t, 0]], (0, -1): [[0, t], [0, 0]]}
path = os.path.join(tempfile.mkdtemp(), "graphene_hr.dat")
hamop.save_wannier90_hr(path, H_R)
cell = a * np.array([[1.0, 0.0], [0.5, np.sqrt(3) / 2]])
centres = np.array([[0.0, 0.0], (cell[0] + cell[1]) / 3])
m = hamop.from_wannier90(path, cell, centers=centres)
k = np.random.default_rng(0).uniform(-2, 2, (20, 2))
diff = np.abs(hamop.bands(m, k) - hamop.bands(hamop.graphene(t, a), k)).max()
print("bands agree to 1e-12 eV at 20 random k-points:", diff < 1e-12)bands agree to 1e-12 eV at 20 random k-points: True
A seedname_hr.dat file (Mostofi et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 185,
2309 (2014)) holds the real-space Hamiltonian but not the lattice
vectors or the orbital centres. You supply the lattice vectors
(cell). The centres are optional: band energies do not depend on
them, but optical matrix elements do, so give the true centres when
you need optics.
Each function's docstring (help(hamop.sigma_optical), for example)
gives its inputs, units and conventions.
The model
TightBindingModel(positions, norb, cell=None)-- sites, orbitals per site and lattice vectors.add_hop(i, j, image, H_block, S_block=None)adds a hopping (and optional overlap) block;set_dipole(i, X)adds on-site position blocks;bloch(k)andbloch_derivative(k, direction)returnH(k), S(k)and their exactk-derivatives;monkhorst_pack(mesh, time_reversal=False)returns an even k-grid with weights.gen_eigh(H, S)-- eigenvalues ofH c = E S c. It drops overlap directions below a threshold ("canonical orthogonalization"; Szabo and Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry, sec. 3.4.5), so a nearly redundant set of orbitals does not produce huge wrong eigenvalues.- Ready-made models:
linear_chain,two_site(a two-atom molecule),graphene,ssh,haldane, andchain_lead_blocks(lead blocks of a chain, for transport).
Bands and density of states
bands,k_path(a path through k-space for a band plot),dos(Gaussian-broadened DOS),fermi_level(chemical potential for a given filling),band_edges(valence-band top, conduction-band bottom and gap aroundmu).
Optics
sigma_optical-- the real optical conductivity (Gaussian or Lorentzian broadening).sigma_tensor-- the complex conductivity tensor componentsigma_ab(omega)between bands, including the Hall componentsigma_xy.drude_weight-- the intraband (Drude) weight.carrier_count-- occupied states per cell, spin included.
Topology and band geometry
berry_phase(along a closed loop in k-space),berry_curvatureandchern_number(on a 2D k-grid, by the lattice method of Fukui, Hatsugai and Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1674 (2005)). With overlap, two conventions are offered (frame="lowdin"or"atomic"); a sparse solver (solver="sparse") serves large cells with few occupied bands.chern_marker-- the local Chern marker of a finite 2D model (Bianco and Resta, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241106(R) (2011)).berry_dipole,band_curvatures,fermi_occupation-- the Berry curvature dipole behind the nonlinear Hall effect (Sodemann and Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015)), computed in two independent ways (method="grad"or"fermi"), the per-band curvature, and the Fermi occupation factor.quantum_geometric_tensor,quantum_metric,quantum_weight-- the quantum metric and Berry curvature of the occupied states (Provost and Vallee, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980); Peotta and Torma, Nat. Commun. 6, 8944 (2015); Onishi and Fu, PRX 14, 011052 (2024)).
Spin and magnetic fields
with_spin-- a spinful copy of a model;PAULI-- the Pauli matrices, for adding Zeeman or spin-orbit terms;kane_mele-- the Kane-Mele model (Kane and Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)).with_peierls-- a uniform magnetic field on a finite model, by Peierls substitution: each hopping gets a phase set by the magnetic flux (Peierls, Z. Phys. 80, 763 (1933)).magnetic_supercell-- a periodic 2D model at rational fluxp/qper cell: the unit cell is repeatedqtimes so that the field fits it (a Hofstadter magnetic cell).
Transport
transmission-- T(E) by a recursive sweep through the layers;transmission_directandtransmission_sparsecompute the same quantity by dense and by sparse inversion.sancho_rubiogives the surface Green function of a lead (Lopez Sancho, Lopez Sancho and Rubio, J. Phys. F 15, 851 (1985)).principal_layers-- cuts a finite model into layers along an axis and checks that no coupling skips a layer.buttiker_transmission-- one dephasing probe, an imaginary contact that scrambles the phase of the electrons passing it but draws no net current (Buttiker, Phys. Rev. B 33, 3020 (1986));multiprobe_transmission-- probes on many layers (D'Amato and Pastawski, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7411 (1990));scba_transmission-- averaged on-site disorder, solved self-consistently (the self-consistent Born approximation, SCBA).device_greens,device_ldos,bond_currents-- the device Green function, the local density of states per orbital, and the map of currents between orbitals (Paulsson and Brandbyge, Phys. Rev. B 76, 115117 (2007)).transmission,transmission_directandtransmission_sparsealso accept your own self-energy per layer (sigma_int).
Large systems
bloch_sparse,bloch_derivative_sparse-- the same matrices asblochandbloch_derivative, stored sparse.lowest_bands-- only the lowest few eigenvalues (Lanczos method, an iterative solver that never forms the full eigenvector set).kpm_dos,kpm_sigma-- DOS and optical conductivity of large finite models by the kernel polynomial method (Weisse, Wellein, Alvermann and Fehske, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006)).
Fewer k-points
monkhorst_pack(..., time_reversal=True)pairskwith-k.symmetry_foldfolds a k-grid by a point group you supply;find_point_groupfinds that group. Both check every operation on the model first.
Interpolation and file exchange
fourier_interpolation,FourierInterpolator-- sampleH(k)on a grid, transform to real space, and evaluate at anyk.from_wannier90,load_wannier90_hr,save_wannier90_hr-- read and write the Wannier90seedname_hr.datformat.
Fitting to measurements
fit_bands,BandFit,band_information,design_kpoints-- example 6;design_kpointsuses greedy D-optimal selection, which adds, one at a time, the k-point that most shrinks the joint uncertainty of the parameters (Pukelsheim, Optimal Design of Experiments, SIAM (2006)).
hamop raises an error with an explanation, instead of returning a
doubtful number, when:
- a periodic model is given to
dos,fermi_level,band_edges,sigma_optical,sigma_tensor,drude_weightorcarrier_countwithoutmeshorkpts; - a function for finite models (
with_peierls,principal_layers,kpm_dos,kpm_sigma,chern_marker) gets a periodic one, or a function that needs a k-grid (monkhorst_pack,symmetry_fold,find_point_group,fourier_interpolation) gets a finite one;berry_curvature,chern_number,band_curvatures,berry_dipole,quantum_weightandmagnetic_supercellneed a periodic 2D model; - a function that does not handle overlap gets a model with overlap:
kpm_sigma,chern_marker, the quantum-geometry functions,band_curvatures/berry_dipole, andsolver="sparse"in the Berry functions; monkhorst_pack(time_reversal=True)is asked of a model with complex hopping blocks, where pairingkwith-kis not guaranteed;- an operation given to
symmetry_folddoes not map the lattice to itself, changes the eigenvalues at a random testk, or moves grid points off the grid; magnetic_supercellcannot represent the flux in its gauge; the message names an equivalent flux that works;principal_layersfinds a coupling that skips a layer (the layers are thinner than the hopping range);- the quantum geometry is asked at a
kwhere the occupied and empty bands are closer thangap_min(the geometry is undefined there); - a Berry link between neighbouring k-points vanishes ("refine the
grid"), or the overlap matrix is not positive definite in the
lowdinframe; - a Wannier90 file is malformed (wrong counts, duplicate or missing elements, a short degeneracy list, an orbital index out of range), its Hamiltonian is not Hermitian, or the cell does not match the file;
- a planned or measured set of band energies cannot tell the fit parameters apart, or there are fewer measurements than parameters;
- a block has the wrong shape, an on-site or dipole block is not Hermitian, or a finite model is given a non-zero lattice image;
- photon energies given to
sigma_opticalorkpm_sigmaare zero or negative (sigma_tensoracceptsomega = 0, the static Hall conductivity of example 3), or the lineshape is unknown; - the temperature is negative;
drude_weightalso refusesT = 0, andberry_dipole(method="fermi")needskT > 0; lowest_bandsis asked for the full spectrum, a filling ormulies outside the spectrum, or the SCBA iteration does not converge.
153 automated tests run on every change, on Python 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14, and once more on Python 3.10 with the oldest NumPy (1.22.0) and SciPy (1.8.0) the package allows. The numerical tests compare the package with a closed-form result, a symmetry, or a second calculation done a different way; none compares against a number stored from an earlier run. The main checks, with the tolerances the tests use:
Bands, DOS, optics
- The chain's bands equal
e0 + 2t cos kato 1e-12; with overlapsthey equal2t cos ka / (1 + 2s cos ka)to 1e-12. - The chain's DOS at the band centre equals
1/(2 pi |t|)to 5e-4, and the DOS integrates to the orbital count to 1e-6. - Graphene's bands touch at K to 1e-9 and sit at
-/+ 3|t|at the zone centre to 1e-12. Its optical conductivity at 1.0 and 1.3 eV is within 5 % ofe^2/(4 hbar). - The two-site molecule absorbs at
2|t|(within 2e-3 eV) with the hand-derived peak height to 1e-3 relative; the Lorentzian lineshape also gives its hand-derived peak height to 1e-3. - Shifting the energy zero with overlap (
H -> H + cS) changes the conductivity, the tensor and the Drude weight by less than 1e-10 (relative, for the Drude weight). - The Drude weight of the half-filled chain equals
8 spin |t| ato 1e-3 relative, and is below 1e-12 for an empty or full band. - An on-site transition is exactly dark without a dipole block; with one, its peak matches the hand-derived value to 1e-3 relative, in the dense route. The same holds in a nonorthogonal basis (two uncoupled atoms give exactly twice one atom).
Topology and geometry
- The Haldane model's Chern number is 1 in the topological phase and 0 in the trivial phase, to 1e-12; it flips sign with the flux; all bands together give 0. The same integers come out with overlap and in both frames; the sparse solver gives 2 for two stacked copies, like the dense one.
sigma_xy(0)equals the Chern number timese^2/hto 1e-6, sign included, and the tensor is antisymmetric to 1e-12.- The SSH chain's Zak phases are 0 or pi to 1e-9 and differ by pi, with and without overlap.
- The Kane-Mele model equals two Haldane copies to 1e-12, and its gap
at K is
6 sqrt(3) lambda_soto 1e-9. - The Chern marker of a 10 x 10 flake sums to zero to 1e-8, and its bulk average is within 0.05 of the Chern number.
- The Berry curvature dipole is below 1e-10 with inversion symmetry and below 1e-12 for completely filled bands. For gapped graphene it at least halves when the mesh doubles, and one strained bond makes it more than 10 times larger. With one mirror line, the component along the mirror is below 1e-8 times the other one. The two integral forms agree within 10 %.
- The quantum metric and curvature match the two-band closed forms to
1e-4 relative;
tr g >= 2 sqrt(det g) >= |Omega|holds at 25 random points per phase; the integrated Chern number is within 0.02 of the lattice one;tr K >= |C|holds in both phases.
Magnetic fields and spin
- A flux-threaded ring matches
2t cos((2 pi j + Theta)/N)to 1e-12; two gauges give the same spectrum to 1e-12; the flux through one square is exact to 1e-12; the spectrum repeats after one flux quantum to 1e-12. - The lowest Landau level of the square lattice sits at
-4|t| + hbar omega_c / 2within 3 %. - At zero flux the magnetic supercell equals folded bands to 1e-12;
at half a flux quantum the square lattice matches
+/- 2|t| sqrt(cos^2 kx + cos^2 ky)to 1e-12; at 1/3 the lowest band's Chern number matchessigma_xyto 1e-4. - Spin doubling gives doublets to 1e-12, and a Zeeman term splits
them by
2Bto 1e-12. With overlap, the Zeeman-split bands equal(2t cos ka -/+ B)/(1 + 2s cos ka)to 1e-12.
Transport
- The lead surface Green function matches its closed form to 1e-6.
- A clean chain transmits 1 inside the band (to 1e-4) and 0 outside (to 1e-8); with overlap it still transmits 1 inside the band; two uncoupled chains transmit 2.
- One impurity matches the closed form to 1e-5.
- The recursive sweep equals direct inversion to 1e-10 (1e-12 with
self-energies, and with overlap at
eta = 0.05); sparse equals dense to 1e-12. - With overlap, the lead surface Green function matches its closed
form to 1e-12 at
eta = 0.05, the Green function of the closed device (leads detached) equals(zS - H)^-1to 1e-12, andi(G - G^dag) = G(GamL + GamR + 2 eta S)G^dagholds to 1e-12. - The Buttiker probe at zero coupling equals the coherent result to 1e-12 and matches the single-site closed form to 1e-8; a probe on every layer gives a resistance linear in length (R^2 > 0.9999); current is conserved to 1e-12.
- SCBA with zero disorder equals the coherent result to 1e-12; its
fixed point is converged below 1e-10 with
Im Sigma <= 0; the central layer of a long chain matches the bulk SCBA equation to 1e-3. - The closed-device LDOS equals the eigenvalue sum to 1e-13 (and to 1e-12 with overlap); bond currents obey Kirchhoff's law to 1e-7 and every cut carries T to 1e-6.
principal_layersreproduces hand-built blocks exactly and refuses layers that are too thin.
Large systems, k-grids, interpolation, files, fitting
- Sparse and dense matrices are identical; Lanczos matches the open chain's closed form to 1e-8 (with overlap too).
- KPM DOS: band-centre value within 1 %, integral within 0.5 %, zero outside the band with overlap. KPM conductivity: molecular line weight within 3 % of the closed form, and within 2 % of the dense route on a dimerized chain.
- The time-reversal fold reproduces DOS and conductivity to 1e-12 and
the Drude weight to 1e-10; the six-fold fold of graphene reproduces
the DOS to 1e-12 and the chemical potential to 1e-9, and wrong
operations are refused.
find_point_groupfinds 12, 8 and 2 operations for the hexagonal, square and chain lattices. - Fourier interpolation reproduces the bands to 1e-12 for five models and flags a too-coarse grid.
- A hand-written graphene
hr.datreproducesgraphene()bands to 1e-12 and its optical conductivity to 1e-10; a save/load round trip keeps each block to 1e-9 (the file stores 10 decimals); four kinds of corrupted file (too few lines, a duplicate element, a short degeneracy list, a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian) and a mismatched cell are refused. - On the chain the fit covariance matches its closed form to 1e-6 relative; 300 seeded simulated experiments match the reported error bars within 15 %; a design that cannot separate the parameters is refused.
0.10.1 fixed six problems.
- Overlap doubled by on-site terms. In a model with overlap, every
on-site block added without its own
S_blockadded another identity toS. Adding an on-site energy or a Zeeman term in a secondadd_hopcall (as thewith_spindocstring suggests) therefore changedSand gave wrong bands. Now each site's on-site overlap is the identity unless you give it explicitly. - Transport with overlap at finite
eta. The NEGF functions built the reverse coupling block as the conjugate transpose ofzS - H, which isconj(z) S^dag - H^dagrather thanz S^dag - H^dag. The error is of ordereta * S: negligible at the defaulteta = 1e-6for transmission, but visible indevice_greensanddevice_ldosat the largeretaoften used for a local DOS. device_ldosignored the inter-layer overlap (coup_S). With overlap the LDOS is-Im (G S)_ii / pi(the Mulliken convention, which shares the overlap between the orbitals involved), so leaving out part ofSmade the orbital LDOS not add up to the total DOS.with_spindropped dipole blocks, so a spinful copy lost the on-site transitions set withset_dipole.carrier_countwithoutmeshorkptssummed a periodic model atk = 0only (2.0 instead of 1.0 for the half-filled chain). It now refuses, like the other functions.- Temperature.
drude_weightreturned NaN atT = 0and a negative weight atT < 0; the other functions acceptedT < 0. Both are now refused.
Earlier README and CHANGELOG text also overstated some checks; the 0.10.1 entry of CHANGELOG.md lists the corrections. The full history is in the CHANGELOG.
These are deliberate choices, not oversights:
- The velocity uses the site-diagonal position approximation; the intra-atomic part enters only through the dipole blocks you supply.
sigma_opticalsums transitions between bands only (pairs closer than 1 meV are left out); adddrude_weightfor metals.symmetry_foldis valid for results that depend on eigenvalues only (DOS, chemical potential, band edges, carrier count), not for direction-dependent ones such assigma_xxor the Drude weight.- The SCBA is elastic (disorder only) and has no vertex corrections (the next-order correction to the disorder-averaged conductance); inelastic electron-phonon scattering is not implemented. Electron-electron interaction enters only as a self-energy you supply; there is no mean-field or GW self-consistency.
bond_currentsworks in an orthogonal basis only (it takes no overlap arguments).kpm_sigmacovers orthogonal, finite models and the longitudinal response only. A KPM Hall conductivity of a finite system is not offered: in this position convention it is zero for any bounded system (Im Tr[PxQy] = 0, itself a test), sochern_markeris the finite-system alternative.fourier_interpolationis the Fourier step of Wannier interpolation; it does not build maximally localized Wannier functions (Marzari and Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997), is not implemented).- The quantum-geometry functions and the Berry curvature dipole handle orthogonal bases only.
- The package ships no material constants. The only physical constant in the code is the Boltzmann constant (CODATA 2018).
Excellent tools cover parts of this space: PythTB and pybinding build tight-binding models and their spectra, and Kwant is the standard for quantum transport. hamop does not replace any of them, and for their core use cases they are more capable. Its niche is the combination they leave open: overlap matrices handled across the observables listed above, optics computed from the same Bloch matrices as the spectrum, and a small NumPy/SciPy-only core checked against closed forms.
Methodological basis:
"Learning the quantum Hamiltonian of defective monolayer MoS2 reveals collective vacancy brightness decoupled from defect count"; code for the paper: https://github.com/Tanvir-Mahmud-Mahim/mos2-vacancy-optics
That study computes the optics, the electronic structure and the transport of vacancy-disordered MoS2 supercells from one density-functional Hamiltonian, so that a defect configuration's optical and electronic signatures are consistent, and its conclusions depend on that consistency. This package is the general-purpose engine distilled from that pipeline: the same observables for any Hamiltonian a user supplies, with the material-specific machinery (DFT extraction, machine-learned Hamiltonians, MoS2 structures) left in the paper repository.
If hamop helps your work, please cite it with the concept DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22311381,
which always resolves to the latest release; every release is
archived on Zenodo. Citation metadata is in
CITATION.cff.
The package is written and maintained by Tanvir Mahmud Mahim (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, BRAC University), who reviews every change and takes the final decision on scope and releases. There is no separate governance body; design questions are discussed in the open in issues and pull requests, and the standing rule of CONTRIBUTING.md binds the maintainer exactly as it binds contributors: a change that touches physics arrives with a test, and a constant arrives with its source.
Support runs through the issue tracker at https://github.com/TaN-MM-Org/hamop/issues. Usage questions are welcome there alongside bug reports; a docstring that left a unit or a sign convention unclear is treated as a documentation bug, not as user error. The maintainer aims to respond within a week.
While the version is below 1.0 the API may still move between minor versions; such changes are called out in the release notes.
Licensed under Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE).