Skip to content

Fix ardac1prd WTS secret source - #101

Merged
esentuna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/ardac1prd-wts-secret
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

esentuna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/ardac1prd-wts-secret

Conversation

@alan-walsh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Point the ARDAC1 WTS ExternalSecret at the environment-prefixed Secrets Manager name allowed by its IAM policy. The historical default wts-g3auto source does not exist in the permitted namespace.

Validation

  • rendered the pinned ARDAC1 Gen3 chart successfully
  • confirmed the rendered WTS ExternalSecret references ardac1prd-default-wts-g3auto
  • git diff --check
  • yamllint (one unrelated pre-existing comment-spacing warning)

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings September 30, 2026 14:34

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The targeted configuration matches the established ARDAC environment naming pattern.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Updates ARDAC1’s WTS configuration to use the IAM-permitted, environment-prefixed secret.

Changes:

  • Configures wtsG3auto as ardac1prd-default-wts-g3auto.
File Description
ardac1prd/​portal.ardac.org/​values.yaml Sets the ARDAC1 WTS ExternalSecret source.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@alan-walsh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Copilot review follow-up: confirmed the environment-prefixed secret exists in Secrets Manager, the pinned ARDAC1 chart renders exactly one WTS ExternalSecret reference to it, and the existing IRSA naming pattern permits this source. No line-level review threads were opened.

@esentuna
esentuna merged commit dddf862 into main Sep 30, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants