Normalize README support markers - #2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Som5ra
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 23, 2026 09:29
Som5ra
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2026
Complete the support-table marker conversion after a full README audit.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Yessupport cell with ✅;Root cause
The previous replacement matched only exact
| Yes |fragments. Cells followed by another column separator or qualifiers did not match consistently, leaving a partial conversion.Validation
Yesvalues and 6 unsupported dashes;Yesor dash markers remain in the README support tables;