feat: add new docs section to profile customization#72
Conversation
|
@mtlouzada is attempting to deploy a commit to the sktbrd's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA comprehensive profile customization guide for SkateHive has been added, documenting how users can update profile fields, configure media assets (magazine cover, profile picture, background), upload and crop images, connect Ethereum wallets, and troubleshoot common issues. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Warning |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/Advance/profile-customization.md (1)
259-263: Fill or remove the empty “Best Practices” section.This section is currently blank and looks unfinished in published docs.
Suggested doc content
## Best Practices +- Use high-contrast cover images so overlay text remains readable. +- Keep profile and cover assets optimized (recommended under 5MB) for faster loading. +- Recheck your profile in both default and Magazine views after saving changes. +- Prefer stable image hosting (or IPFS) for long-term asset availability. ## FAQ🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/Advance/profile-customization.md` around lines 259 - 263, The "Best Practices" section header in docs/Advance/profile-customization.md is empty and should be either populated or removed; update the document by either adding concise, relevant guidance under the "Best Practices" heading (e.g., recommended configuration steps, common pitfalls, and examples relevant to profile customization) or delete the "## Best Practices" header if no guidance is needed—ensure the "## FAQ" section follows cleanly and commit the change referencing the "Best Practices" header for location.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/Advance/profile-customization.md`:
- Around line 117-121: The document currently lists two conflicting image
file-size limits; choose a single canonical limit (e.g., "Under 5MB" or "Max
10MB") and update every occurrence to match; specifically update the
"Recommended image specs" block (the list containing Dimensions/Aspect
ratio/File size/Format) and the other occurrence referenced in the comment (the
block at lines 218-220) so both show the same file-size wording and value, and
ensure the chosen phrasing is applied consistently throughout the
"profile-customization.md" content.
- Around line 271-273: Update the answer to "Q: Are my images stored forever?"
to remove the absolute claim that IPFS is "permanent" and instead explain that
persistence depends on pinning and node availability; mention that content
remains accessible while pinned or cached by nodes/gateways and recommend
pinning services or self-hosted pins for long-term availability, e.g., replace
the current sentence with a short note clarifying that IPFS is decentralized but
not inherently permanent without pinning or replication.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/Advance/profile-customization.md`:
- Around line 259-263: The "Best Practices" section header in
docs/Advance/profile-customization.md is empty and should be either populated or
removed; update the document by either adding concise, relevant guidance under
the "Best Practices" heading (e.g., recommended configuration steps, common
pitfalls, and examples relevant to profile customization) or delete the "## Best
Practices" header if no guidance is needed—ensure the "## FAQ" section follows
cleanly and commit the change referencing the "Best Practices" header for
location.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 2ed60368-d476-4659-89fe-7d399354db9a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/Advance/profile-customization.md
| **Recommended image specs:** | ||
| - **Dimensions:** 1000px × 1300px (portrait orientation) | ||
| - **Aspect ratio:** 0.77:1 (magazine cover ratio) | ||
| - **File size:** Under 5MB for faster loading | ||
| - **Format:** JPEG (best for photos), PNG (for graphics/text) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unify conflicting file-size limits.
The guide states two different limits (Under 5MB vs max 10MB). Please use one canonical value everywhere to avoid user confusion.
Suggested doc fix
- - **File size:** Under 5MB for faster loading
+ - **File size:** Maximum 10MB (recommended under 5MB for faster loading)Also applies to: 218-220
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/Advance/profile-customization.md` around lines 117 - 121, The document
currently lists two conflicting image file-size limits; choose a single
canonical limit (e.g., "Under 5MB" or "Max 10MB") and update every occurrence to
match; specifically update the "Recommended image specs" block (the list
containing Dimensions/Aspect ratio/File size/Format) and the other occurrence
referenced in the comment (the block at lines 218-220) so both show the same
file-size wording and value, and ensure the chosen phrasing is applied
consistently throughout the "profile-customization.md" content.
| **Q: Are my images stored forever?** | ||
| A: Images uploaded to IPFS are permanent and decentralized. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid absolute permanence claim for IPFS storage.
“Permanent” is too strong and can mislead users; persistence depends on pinning and content availability.
Suggested wording
- A: Images uploaded to IPFS are permanent and decentralized.
+ A: Images uploaded to IPFS are decentralized; long-term availability depends on pinning/retention.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| **Q: Are my images stored forever?** | |
| A: Images uploaded to IPFS are permanent and decentralized. | |
| **Q: Are my images stored forever?** | |
| A: Images uploaded to IPFS are decentralized; long-term availability depends on pinning/retention. | |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/Advance/profile-customization.md` around lines 271 - 273, Update the
answer to "Q: Are my images stored forever?" to remove the absolute claim that
IPFS is "permanent" and instead explain that persistence depends on pinning and
node availability; mention that content remains accessible while pinned or
cached by nodes/gateways and recommend pinning services or self-hosted pins for
long-term availability, e.g., replace the current sentence with a short note
clarifying that IPFS is decentralized but not inherently permanent without
pinning or replication.
1 participant
How to personalize your SkateHive profile with custom images, information, and your own magazine cover.
Summary by CodeRabbit