Skip to content

chore(agentctl): drop descriptor keys agentctl does not read - #4689

Closed
Sinity wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/agentctl-descriptor
Closed

chore(agentctl): drop descriptor keys agentctl does not read#4689
Sinity wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/agentctl-descriptor

Conversation

@Sinity

@Sinity Sinity commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

agentctl (sinnix refactor/agentctl-structure) rejects descriptor tables and fields it does not read, and writes a worker's prompt, schema and result under .agentctl/ instead of .lane/.

  • .agentctl/project.toml: remove preflight, preflight_timeout_seconds, provider, identity_check, checkpoint_untracked, verification_operations, [conflicts] and [owner_adapters].
  • .gitignore: .agentctl/* with !.agentctl/project.toml.
  • tests/unit/devtools/test_verify.py: drop the assertion on verification_operations; no devtools code reads it.

Behaviour-neutral for current agentctl (the keys were ignored); required once the sinnix branch deploys, which otherwise reports the project out of service.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01YHwAE9cH8DjXFSorzfSxD8

agentctl rejects unknown descriptor tables and fields, so the retired
`preflight`, `provider`, `identity_check`, `checkpoint_untracked`,
`verification_operations`, `[conflicts]` and `[owner_adapters]` entries
go. The files agentctl writes into a worker worktree now live under
`.agentctl/` (prompt, result schema, result); .gitignore excludes them and
keeps project.toml tracked.

tests/unit/devtools/test_verify.py stops asserting the removed key; nothing
else in the repository reads it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YHwAE9cH8DjXFSorzfSxD8
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 8bd377de-9392-4f25-bb1f-e7babf81bbaf


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review 🔄 Running since 2026-09-05T14:47:56.385824Z a6988e4 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Sinity

Sinity commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Folded into #4681, which carries the descriptor cleanup on top of the pytest-slot change.

@Sinity Sinity closed this Sep 5, 2026
Sinity added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2026
- `.agentctl/project.toml` drops `[conflicts]`, `[owner_adapters]` and the
  environment preflight; agentctl on the host refuses unknown tables and
  fields, and nothing in this repository reads them.
- `.gitignore` keeps `.agentctl/project.toml` tracked and ignores what
  agentctl writes beside it.
- Tests: the descriptor contract asserts the `verify` and `publish`
  workspace keys; the receipt test derives its future mtime from the file,
  not the host clock; the pytest_slot verb helper keeps the job id.

Folds #4689.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YHwAE9cH8DjXFSorzfSxD8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant