Skip to content

Raise DataInterpolations floor to 9.2 - #503

Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:raise-downgrade-compat-floors
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

Raise DataInterpolations floor to 9.2#503
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:raise-downgrade-compat-floors

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please ignore this PR until it has been reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.

What changed

extras DataInterpolations [compat] 99.2. No code or package version change.

Why

Default-branch Downgrade is red while Tests are green (run). test/sources.jl BSplineInterpolation calls the 4-arg form (u, t, d, knotVecType). DataInterpolations 9.0.0 / 9.1.0 only expose a 5-arg (u, t, d, pVecType, knotVecType). 9.2.0 dropped pVecType and restored the 4-arg method this package uses.

Verification

CI fail-before: MethodError: no method matching BSplineInterpolation(::Vector{Float64}, ::Vector{Float64}, ::Int64, ::Symbol) on DataInterpolations 9.0.0.

Not verified here: the full MTKSL suite or a live julia-downgrade-compat run.

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Local isolated-depot proof on Julia 1.10.11 (fail-before / pass-after):

  • DataInterpolations.BSplineInterpolation(rand(8), collect(1.0:8.0), 3, :Uniform) on 9.0.0MethodError: no method matching BSplineInterpolation(::Vector{Float64}, ::Vector{Float64}, ::Int64, ::Symbol)
  • same call on 9.2.0 → OK

@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2026 09:16
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas merged commit 878f008 into SciML:main Aug 15, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants