Skip to content

Drop unsupported Reexport 0.2 compat - #90

Closed
ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
SciML:masterfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:agent/drop-reexport-0-2
Closed

ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
SciML:masterfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:agent/drop-reexport-0-2

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please ignore this PR until it has been reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.

Summary

  • Require Reexport 1.
  • Remove the stale Reexport 0.2 compatibility range, which is already impossible with MATLABDiffEq's SciMLBase floor.

Why

An explicit resolver probe with Reexport 0.2.0 and the existing SciMLBase 3.27 floor is unsatisfiable because SciMLBase 3.x requires Reexport 1.x. The removed range therefore does not represent a valid installation graph.

Validation

The exact Julia 1.10 downgrade resolver completed successfully and selected Reexport 1.2.2. The locked root manifest remained unchanged through the test run (SHA-256 db886938804bbd2a503f828695d9d15403e9a18d3c93e64be2ba584e682ae363).

With the repository's CI-mode MATLAB.jl build path:

  • Core interface tests: 40/40 passed.
  • Core JET tests: 34/34 passed.
  • The existing runtime test explicitly reported that no MATLAB engine was installed and skipped its engine-dependent solves.
  • QA: 17 passed, 1 existing configured broken check; Pkg.test() exited successfully.

Additional checks passed:

  • Focused Reexport 1.2.2 @reexport macro smoke test.
  • Full-repository Runic.
  • TOML parse and exact compat assertion.
  • git diff --check and one-file diff-scope verification.

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing as superseded by #91, which has now merged and contains this PR's exact Drop unsupported Reexport 0.2 compat commit (1a21b08d) together with the independent ModelingToolkit floor. No change from this branch remains unmerged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants