Feature/adding blip to caf

[Jjm321814]

This is part of a large array of PR to add blip objects to CAF files.
Previously the key blip structs were defined in sbndcode and this PR simply moves them to sbnobj.

[Jjm321814]

An associated branch in sbndcode (also feature/AddingBlipToCAF) has the updated libraries linking necessary to point here. Once this one is in a release we can delete the file copies in sbndcode

[kjplows]

Hi @Jjm321814 , is there a required PR in sbndcode to accompany this? If yes, please point me to that PR. Thanks!

[kjplows]

Also summoning @PetrilloAtWork to take a look if there's time, not sure if ICARUS has something similar to this?

[Jjm321814]

The related sbndcode changes are in SBNSoftware/sbndcode#871 but they depend on this PR, not the other way around.
This one just moves some struct definitions out of sbndcode and into sbnobj so that it can be imported into sbncode for CAFMaker.

[Jjm321814]

Adding a comment to each of these to track all 4 related PR.
sbncode: SBNSoftware/sbncode#603
sbndcode: SBNSoftware/sbndcode#871
sbnobj: #155
sbnanaobj: SBNSoftware/sbnanaobj#173

The changes to sbnobj, and sbnanaobj are fully independent of any other changes, so they can be approved first.

sbndcode changes rely on sbnobj, so it will have to wait for the first approval. A later simple PR will delete the (now duplicated) class files in the BlipUtils folder here

sbncode changes rely on both sbnobj and sbnanaobj, so that will have to wait for both of the first two approvals.

[Jjm321814]

Accidentally ran with the wrong blip tag and still produced a CAF file in sbndcode area, so I expect it will work with ICARUS but I can not test it.

[Jjm321814]

All the suggestions here have been committed. Every struct has doxygen comments, TVector3 has been generally replaced, and the few housekeeping comments have been accepted.
A later fix can remove TVector3 from blip processing steps too. May I ask what is the issue with TVector3?

[kjplows]

Hi @PetrilloAtWork , it looks like Jacob has implemented all the changes requested. How does the PR look now? Thanks!