[claude-code] trivial ssa destruction implementation#55
Draft
[claude-code] trivial ssa destruction implementation#55
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #55 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.32% 43.42% +7.09%
==========================================
Files 122 125 +3
Lines 4583 3853 -730
==========================================
+ Hits 1665 1673 +8
+ Misses 2838 2078 -760
- Partials 80 102 +22 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is my first vibe coding experience. I just gave claude code a link to #43 and it went and implemented it. Burned 4.25$ (API) with Claude Opus 4.6.
Seems like a decent implementation to be, although it took the trivial approach, and not the approach I intended in #43. Needs some more polish before merging (for example, I don't like the generated label names currently, and the tests structure can be improved, and more tests should be added).
Plus, I did not touch to project for a year+, so I do not feel comfortable to merge this because I do not remember the project structure, best practices, etc. So for now I'm leaving it and hopefully I will make the appropriate changes & merge some day.