Repository navigation
Add geothermal regional capital cost differences - #236
Closed
savanthongvanh wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
savanthongvanh wants to merge 1 commit into
savanthongvanh wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
Our interpretation of the data in Table 1-11 is slightly different; instead of state-wide averages we map from the cities provided to the nearest county. PR #255 takes a pass at implementing this approach if you'd like to use it for your work. Given the other PR with a fix I think we can close this one, but thanks for taking a pass at it! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
GEOregional capital-cost difference for all counties in the default input table, covering ReEDS geothermal technologies in theGEOsubset.Fixes #233