You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Guardrail entries in an LLM config can only reference a saved validator_config_id, preventing direct definition of validators and requiring deletion to disable, which loses setup.
Describe the solution you'd like
Allow guardrail entries to be a validator_config_id or an inline validator spec (type, on_fail, per-type params).
Restrict inline type to gender_assumption_bias, pii_remover, profanity_free, topic_relevance_llm.
Add an is_enabled flag (default true) to both entry types. Disabled entries remain saved but are not fetched or sent.
Send validators in config order to the guardrails service. Include stage on inline specs and remove is_enabled to comply with validator schemas.
Original issue
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Guardrail entries in an LLM config blob (input_guardrails / output_guardrails) can only reference a validator_config_id saved in the guardrails service. A validator cannot be defined directly in the config, and the only way to turn one off is to delete it from the config version, which loses its setup.
Describe the solution you'd like
Let each guardrail entry be either a validator_config_id reference or an inline validator spec (type, on_fail, per-type params).
Restrict inline type to gender_assumption_bias, pii_remover, profanity_free, topic_relevance_llm for now.
Add an is_enabled flag (default true) to both entry kinds. Disabled entries stay saved in the config version but are never fetched or sent to the guardrails service.
Send validators to the guardrails service in config order. Stamp stage on inline specs and strip is_enabled, since the service's validator schemas forbid extra fields.
Activity
[-]Guardrails: Support inline validators and is_enabled[/-][+]Guardrails: Inline validator support[/+]github-actions commentedon Oct 16, 2026
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.8.0-main.11 🎉
The release is available on GitHub release
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀