Skip to content

Refresh README hero and add artifact-backed benchmark snapshot#79

Closed
ProfRandom92 wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/update-comptextv7-readme-for-enterprise-readiness
Closed

Refresh README hero and add artifact-backed benchmark snapshot#79
ProfRandom92 wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/update-comptextv7-readme-for-enterprise-readiness

Conversation

@ProfRandom92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • Remove decorative/broken header graphics and present a compact, enterprise-ready text-first hero that communicates scope and trustworthiness quickly.
  • Surface deterministic, auditable benchmark values from committed artifacts so reviewers can validate claims without running external services.
  • Make integrity and limitation boundaries explicit (no LLM judging, no embeddings, no external APIs) to improve auditability for enterprise reviewers.

Description

  • Replaced the image-first header with a text-first hero and concise positioning lines: # Comptextv7 and the one-line descriptor; removed decorative and dead image markup. The only modified file is README.md.
  • Added concise badges sourced from the repository and shields.io for Python and CI, and static badges for Deterministic Replay, No LLM Judging, Replay Artifacts, and Operational State.
  • Inserted an artifact-backed benchmark snapshot populated from artifacts/paper_replay_results.json and artifacts/agent_trace_replay_results.json (paper: 3 papers, avg_compression_ratio 1.347063, replay_consistency 0.791667; agent: 3 traces, avg_compression_ratio 1.773954, replay_consistency 1.000000, operational_drift 0.000000).
  • Added the requested Mermaid architecture diagram, a compact What exists now capability table, an Integrity model section describing determinism and auditability, and a short Limitations section that remains factual and non-hype.

Testing

  • Ran the project continuity test python -m pytest tests/test_replay_continuity.py which completed successfully (8 passed).
  • Ran an automated README verification script that confirmed the benchmark values in README.md match the committed JSON artifacts and confirmed decorative image markup was removed, and that check passed.
  • No other code changes were made, so repository CI workflows remain unchanged and were not modified by this PR.

Codex Task

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 14, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
comptextv7 Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 14, 2026 1:33pm

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented May 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for comptext-v7 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e1a8d5e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/comptext-v7/deploys/6a05cf087f27c30008f8ad1a

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly refactors the README.md to focus on deterministic operational memory and CI-audited replay checks, removing extensive research-oriented descriptions in favor of a concise benchmark snapshot and integrity model. A review comment identifies a potential inconsistency regarding the project's limitations, noting that the document lists iterative replay degradation as a future target despite existing reports covering up to 250 iterations.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
- Current benchmarks use curated fixtures, not broad production traffic.
- This is not solved AI memory and does not claim general long-term recall.
- This is not an autonomous agent framework.
- Iterative replay degradation is the next validation target.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The limitation "Iterative replay degradation is the next validation target" appears to be inconsistent with the "Primary replay-continuity benchmark" described later in the document (line 73) and the results already present in reports/replay_continuity/validation_report.md, which explicitly covers up to 250 iterations. If this limitation refers to a specific subset of benchmarks (e.g., the Paper or Agent Trace benchmarks) or a higher scale of iteration, please clarify it to avoid confusing reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant