Skip to content

fix(ap-mode): validate cidr prefix range in bring up interface - #6086

Closed
vaibhavsrv wants to merge 1 commit into
Osmantic:public-betafrom
vaibhavsrv:fix/ap-mode-cidr-prefix-bounds
Closed

vaibhavsrv wants to merge 1 commit into
Osmantic:public-betafrom
vaibhavsrv:fix/ap-mode-cidr-prefix-bounds

Conversation

@vaibhavsrv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why this matters

In ods/scripts/ap-mode.sh, bring_up_interface() resolved the network prefix from $ODS_AP_PREFIX (or derived it from $ODS_AP_NETMASK) and directly executed ip addr add "${ODS_AP_GATEWAY_IP}/${prefix}" dev "${ODS_AP_INTERFACE}" without bounds checking the prefix value. If an operator set an invalid or out-of-range CIDR prefix (such as 0, 33, 99, negative values, or non-numeric tokens), the script brought the interface up, flushed IP addresses, and then aborted with an unhandled iproute2 command failure, leaving the wireless interface in a detached, unconfigured state.

This change introduces strict range validation ([[ "$prefix" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && (( prefix >= 1 && prefix <= 32 ))) before performing interface configuration. Invalid prefix values fail early with a descriptive error message. Existing netmask conversion, gateway IP defaults, and captive portal iptables rules remain untouched.

Validation

  • Baseline reproduction: Calling bring_up_interface with an invalid ODS_AP_PREFIX=99 or non-numeric value progressed to ip addr add without prefix validation.
  • Post-fix verification: Running ods/tests/test_ap_mode_prefix_validation.py asserts that invalid CIDR prefixes (0, 33, 99, -1, "abc") are rejected immediately with exit code 1 and error messaging, while standard valid subnets pass validation.
  • Telemetry: AP mode test suite: test_ap_mode_prefix_validation.py passes cleanly (exit code 0). Wired into Linux CI workflow under AP network identity preflight.

Overlap check

Risk / AI disclosure

AI-assisted investigation, implementation, and test regressions. This strengthens CIDR prefix validation during AP interface bring-up. Independent human review and platform/runtime qualification remain gates. No running configuration, deployment or upstream merge changed.

Follow-up integration evidence

Composed with #6076, #6077, #6078, #6079, #6080, #6081, #6082, #6083, #6084, and #6085 at HEAD without conflicts. Production and test diffs passed together; AP mode and network identity checks remain intact.
Backlog composition was local-only (production/test diffs, excluding workflow/Makefile wiring); it is not an upstream merge or independent human approval. Declared live-review gates remain open.

@Lightheartdevs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for this contribution. public-beta was promoted into main on 2026-09-24 and no longer receives changes, so we're closing pull requests that target it. This isn't a judgment on the change itself. If it's still needed, please rebase onto main and open a focused PR. See #7253 for details and the contribution policy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants