All issues

Add decision authorship to the Review Framework: the evidence list already captures who approved, but not who authored the outcome

#19

· djangamane opened

on Aug 20, 2026

SAFE Evidence Preservation requires chain of custody for third-party data provenance

#17

· evilson opened

on Aug 19, 2026

Who is responsible for SAFE reporting when an open-weight model is deployed downstream?

#16

· evilson opened

on Aug 16, 2026

Add explicit authority revalidation state after material change to SAFE evidence

#15

· Sellynet opened

on Aug 16, 2026

Public Comment: Strengthening Evidence Reconciliation and Independent Verification in SAFE

#14

· AgroMoo opened

on Aug 16, 2026

Define machine-verifiable approval-to-execution scope binding for SAFE evidence

#13

· lumirosh opened

on Aug 13, 2026

How should SAFE reports identify the affected AI system? Proposal: align with existing BOM identifier standards

#12

· Manoharan-mudaliar opened

on Aug 13, 2026

Evidence Preservation specifies what to retain but not that it be independently verifiable

#11

· CyberGuardian-XRSI opened

on Aug 12, 2026

Verification methods should disclose systematic mislabel classes (well-formed wrong answers), not only fail-open and noise

#10

· espirado opened

on Aug 11, 2026

Add an optional causal incident graph profile for reconstructable, mechanically verifiable SAFE findings

#7

· safal207 opened

on Aug 10, 2026

Add a pre-connection tool-trust attestation as an interoperable evidence type, expressed against the OTel GenAI conventions

#6

· kenneives opened

on Aug 8, 2026

Specify a machine-readable baseline for the Evidence Preservation list: map it to OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions

#5

· meshailabs opened

on Aug 6, 2026