-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
Image build cache improvements #3971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
EmilyRagan
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
image-build-cache-improvements
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5313b1f
rebuild and re-cache openc3-ruby when there are available apt upgrade…
EmilyRagan e11d687
rebuild and re-cache for images not based on openc3-ruby
EmilyRagan 1910338
address CVEs in bundled npm packages
EmilyRagan 61dc6ca
ci(build-cosmos): key image cache on external base digest
EmilyRagan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The probe only catches upstream fixes that show up as pending OS package
upgrades. Bases like
ruby:3.4-slim-trixie,valkey/valkey:9.1.2-trixieand
traefik:v3.7.13get republished under the same tag (patchedRuby/Valkey/Traefik binaries, Go CVE rebuilds). With no package delta, the
probe returns 0 and the stale cached image is served.
Suggest mixing each external base's digest into the cache key in the hash
step, so a republished tag becomes a normal miss and cascades to children:
base_refcould be a fourth column in the spec heredoc. On a failedlookup, warn and skip pushing that entry rather than caching under a key
that claims fresh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great call out, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please address @mcosgriff comments then LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmthomas @mcosgriff I believe this is addressed by my most recent commit, please re-review!