fix(deps): update rust crate addr2line to 0.27

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
addr2line	dependencies	minor	0.25 → 0.27

---

Release Notes

gimli-rs/addr2line (addr2line)

v0.27.1

Compare Source

Changed

• Updated object dependency.

---

v0.27.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

• Updated gimli dependency.

---

v0.26.1

Compare Source

Changed

• Improved error handling in addr2line binary.
  #​368

• Updated object dependency to improve Loader::find_symbol.
  #​369

---

v0.26.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

• Updated gimli dependency.

Changed

• The minimum supported rust version (MSRV) is 1.88.0.

• Updated demangle to handle C++ 17 and 20.
  #​357

• Changed internal sorting to use unstable sort.
  #​358
  #​359

• Updated dependencies.
  #​361

Added

• Added relocatable object file support to Loader.
  #​362

---

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "every weekend"
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7195729

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[socket-security]

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff	Package	Supply Chain Security	Vulnerability	Quality	Maintenance	License
	cargo/​addr2line@​0.25.1 ⏵ 0.27.1

View full report

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 79.91%. Comparing base (3dc039e) to head (8d9c7c6).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/edr_solidity/src/debug_info/dwarf.rs	87.50%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1626   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.90%   79.91%           
=======================================
  Files         452      452           
  Lines       78968    78964    -4     
  Branches    78968    78964    -4     
=======================================
- Hits        63103    63101    -2     
- Misses      13687    13688    +1     
+ Partials     2178     2175    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nebasuke]

This actually needs a Benchmark run with the major gimli update.

[nebasuke]

I have some potential performance concerns with the current DWARF time/memory complexity in EDR. I'm adding some performance benchmarks before merging this, as this PR changes DWARF from lazy to eager parsing and should be benchmarked well.

[Wodann]

I have some potential performance concerns with the current DWARF time/memory complexity in EDR. I'm adding some performance benchmarks before merging this, as this PR changes DWARF from lazy to eager parsing and should be benchmarked well.

@nebasuke Do you have an easy way of testing the solx-benchmarks from Hardhat with local changes in EDR?

[nebasuke]

I have some potential performance concerns with the current DWARF time/memory complexity in EDR. I'm adding some performance benchmarks before merging this, as this PR changes DWARF from lazy to eager parsing and should be benchmarked well.

@nebasuke Do you have an easy way of testing the solx-benchmarks from Hardhat with local changes in EDR?

No, not yet. I reckon this will be a bit easier now that the plugin is public. I will likely just do ad-hoc testing for now to make sure performance looks fine, and focus on one more solx release.

Note that Slang based solx will use a different plugin, so I will likely wait until that's shaped up until I focus on more flexible benchmarking.