Salvage: factual landing-page copy + 'use your judgment' CLAUDE.md directive#70
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Salvaged from stash@{1} (WIP on main). The honesty pass on perf claims
in that stash already landed via the site refresh; this problem-statement
copy softening ('best' -> 'default'/'most-used'/'most popular') was the
only unapplied remainder. Keeps marketing claims factual and consistent
with the rest of the rewritten landing page.
Salvaged from stash@{1} — the remaining unapplied line from that stash.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TLDR
Salvages the two unapplied remnants of stale stashes: softens superlative "best Python tooling" landing-page copy to factual claims, and adds a "use your judgment, don't stop to ask" directive to CLAUDE.md.
What Was Added?
⚠️ DO NOT STOP TO ASK QUESTIONS. USE YOUR JUDGMENT WITHOUT ASKING THE USER ⚠️.What Was Changed or Deleted?
website/src/index.njk, problem-statement section only — two copy edits replacing subjective superlatives with factual, defensible wording (consistent with the honesty pass already live on the rest of the page):No behaviour, markup structure, classes, or links changed — text content only.
How Do The Automated Tests Prove It Works?
make ci(lint + test + build) ran to completion with exit code 0 — the full Rust lint/test/coverage suite passed and the build's final step reported "✓ VS Code extension compiled". The change is docs/website copy with no code paths, so existing coverage thresholds remain satisfied (no source lines added/removed).Spec / Doc Changes
Breaking Changes
Provenance: both edits were recovered from two superseded git stashes whose other content had already landed via the site refresh. The stashes have since been dropped; this PR preserves their only useful unapplied remainder.