Skip to content

APE-R003: initialize ambiguity-performance autonomous research lab - #3

Draft
Natoshi-moto wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
agent/ape-r003-ambiguity-performance
Draft

APE-R003: initialize ambiguity-performance autonomous research lab#3
Natoshi-moto wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
agent/ape-r003-ambiguity-performance

Conversation

@Natoshi-moto

@Natoshi-moto Natoshi-moto commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What this publishes

This proposal initializes three synchronized research lines:

  • APE-X001 — falsifiable evaluation of exceptional prompt/system ability
  • APE-X002 — ambiguity, performance, and live-tool authorization
  • APE-X003 — Noted as a sovereign market for creative work, typed resources, AI reasoning, and portable Nexus HTML kernels

It preserves the supplied Semantic Singularity paper as untrusted raw source material, then keeps interpretation, architecture, corrections, and receipts separate.

Agent corrections preserved

The public correction ledger records two assistant overreaches:

  1. strengthening an observation about downstream textual consequence into a claim of predictive control;
  2. implying the user offered etymology as proof when they requested etymological research and a connecting thesis.

Provider-neutral lab

The candidate lab protocol defines replaceable AUTHOR, ADVERSARY, REPRODUCER, EVALUATOR, SYNTHESIZER, and CUSTODIAN seats; exact runtime disclosure; machine-readable handoffs; bounded autonomy; and human-only canonical promotion. It is designed for hosted providers and local models without hidden shared memory.

Architecture added

  • Semantic Action Firewall separating observation, interpretation, authorization, execution, and effect
  • sovereign social-computing thesis across IRC, Nostr, mesh, bundles, and ordinary web transports
  • Noted destination architecture
  • typed resource offers for storage, RAM-bound execution, CPU/GPU, bandwidth, relays, archives, and inference
  • content-addressed HTML kernel contract for local, hosted, P2P, and Noted-mounted execution
  • draft TED-talk spine
  • initialization and addendum receipts

Evidence status

All safety, novelty, first-of-kind, compression, low-resource, and market-feasibility claims remain CANDIDATE or UNVERIFIED. No experiment was run. No canonical prompt, locked fixture, current main route, or accepted status file was modified.

Checks

  • JSON parse: PASS for LAB_STATE and both receipts
  • supplied source hash: 12dc5e8a6e152acdedc12e9abd880af808e09efd9096f7bf687920c9d36937ad
  • exact head: 903ddce
  • GitHub Actions Validate repository contracts run 29370001563: SUCCESS

Promotion

HUMAN_ONLY. This draft PR is a public proposal and autonomous research entry surface, not a merge request with self-granted authority.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant