-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
Add cleanup for dpf scoped service interfaces #5045
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
aadvani-nvidia
wants to merge
1
commit into
NVIDIA:main
Choose a base branch
from
aadvani-nvidia:dpf_scoped_intf
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+268
−74
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
Restrict legacy cleanup to NICo-owned interfaces.
delete_stale_legacy_service_interfaceslists everyDPUServiceInterfacein the namespace and deletes each one whosenode_selectorisNone. There is no name, label, or ownership filter. AnyDPUServiceInterfacein the DPF namespace that NICo did not create is deleted during a scoped migration, provided it carries no node selector.Compare the scoped path at Line 1640: that path gates deletion on the
-bf3/-bf4/-astrasuffix, so it never touches foreign resources. The legacy path has no equivalent gate.Gate deletion on NICo ownership. The
applyimplementation incrates/dpf/src/repository/kube.rsalready uses thecarbide-dpf-sdkfield manager, so a NICo-applied label on the interface template is the natural marker. A name-inventory check against the effective interface list is an acceptable alternative.Note that the new test at
crates/dpf/src/test/sdk_initialization.rsLine 1039 seedsc2pf3from a superseded intercept inventory and asserts its removal. Any ownership filter must still delete that resource, so a label or field-manager marker is preferable to a strict current-inventory match.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents