fix(tier3): handle negative controls in insights - #58
Conversation
Signed-off-by: rookepoole <rookpool97@gmail.com>
chrisknvidia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Requesting changes for three negative-control correctness gaps that still reproduce at the current head. The inline comments are limited to behavior required for issue #57: enforcing evidence-grounded output, matching runtime routing semantics, and preserving case/trial correlation.
rng1995
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the current head. I independently reproduced the six-case negative-006 case/trial metadata loss already captured in the newly opened correlation thread, so I am not duplicating that inline. I found no additional non-duplicate findings beyond the three current request-changes threads.
Signed-off-by: rookepoole <rookpool97@gmail.com>
|
@rookepoole - Thanks for your contribution! Please resolve merge conflicts to merge your PR. |
rng1995
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re-reviewed eed4780. The runtime-routing precedence and sampled trial/case identity fixes now hold, and their focused regressions pass. The post-parse evidence invariant remains bypassable through ordinary paraphrases, so I am requesting changes for the remaining P1 inline.
|
Looks good to me, All the comments are addressed now. |
Signed-off-by: rookepoole <rookpool97@gmail.com>
|
@rookepoole : Please resolve merge conflicts to merge your PR |
Signed-off-by: rookepoole <rookpool97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Kevin <christopherk@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Kevin <christopherk@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Kevin <christopherk@nvidia.com>
chrisknvidia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re-reviewed the exact final head 3daa3fd. This approval supersedes my earlier changes-requested review. The complete negative-control grounding and persisted-reward redaction paths passed the final local, integration, and hosted gates; no remaining Critical or Important findings.
|
Updated this PR on current Final verification on head
Docker was unavailable and no paid-provider/model request was made. I have submitted a fresh approval on this exact head. @rng1995, please re-review the final head when convenient so your earlier change request can be superseded. This PR is ready for final maintainer review and has not been merged or configured for auto-merge. |
Fixes #57
Summary
should_triggertakes precedence, otherwisebool(expected_skill), while truly unlabeled legacy cases remain distinct.Verification
git diff --check: passed.Known verification limits
tests/test_nvidia_build_bridge.py::test_dynamic_bridge_ignores_prebound_old_port_and_checker_authenticates_healthwas excluded because another local process already owned127.0.0.1:18080. Docker was unavailable because the configured daemon timed out, so no Docker-backed Harbor run was completed. No paid-provider/model request was made.