B3 fix

[ptrbortolotti]

This PR allows to run b3_secfem, commit https://github.com/gbarter/b3_secfem/commit/8d6ac3943a2648ff787f93071f8c820a6219455b

Two key changes:

• SONATA has historically called anbax assigning E[0] (E11, fiber direction), to Ezz, E[1] (E22, transverse), to Exx, and E[2] (E33, through fibers) to Eyy (

  SONATA/SONATA/anbax/anbax_utl.py

  Line 30 in 73281a0

  matMechanicProp[0,0] = m.E[1] #Exx

  ). This is now replicated in classMaterial.py
• b3_secfem was missing a rotation in the stresses, see the commit above 8d6ac39 to b3_secfem

Tests 01, 02, and 07 still required an updated of the reference values, but changes are hopefully acceptably small. See below a comparison for the K and I matrices for the IEA15 reference wind turbine. Note that the M matrix is nearly identical, whereas some (negligibly small?) differences persist in K

Two additional changes:

• Updated the dependencies in environment.yaml
• Renamed a few files, print statements, and function calls from anba/anbax to b3_secfem

Diagonal of K, y on log scale

Diagonal of M, y on log scale

First row of K, y NOT on log scale

Second row of K, y NOT on log scale

Third row of K, y NOT on log scale

Fourth row of K, y NOT on log scale

Fifth row of K, y NOT on log scale

Sixth row of K, y NOT on log scale

Off diagonal terms of M, y NOT on log scale

Once b3_secfem is made public, tests should start to pass on GitHub actions. Acknowledgments will also be due to @wr1. Lastly, we should ask co-pilot to overhaul the documentation of SONATA, which is terribly outdated

[PorterJustin]

Flagging to check that the solver input should be one of these and not anba. Do we ever check that the user gives a valid input for sovler?

[PorterJustin]

Why is b3_secfem here twice?

[PorterJustin]

Flagging the '-6.2101162109742521e-05 ' to look more closely since it seems like a big change, but also a really small number, so not sure yet if it is an issue.

[PorterJustin]

The ratios between all the components are still consistent, so this is fine.

[PorterJustin]

I don't have any concerns with this PR. A few minor comments above, but also okay with just merging since those aren't major issues introduced here.

I just looked through the PR diffs. I would separately want to verify all of the b3_secfem work is fully consistent/all the theory in that code makes sense with SONATA.

[PorterJustin]

See comments on PR for potential improvements, but okay with me to merge.