Skip to content

docs(tunit): close out PLAN-0040 (Phase 3 docs/skill consistency pass) - #80

Merged
ncipollina merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/plan-0040-phase3-tunit-closeout
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

docs(tunit): close out PLAN-0040 (Phase 3 docs/skill consistency pass)#80
ncipollina merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/plan-0040-phase3-tunit-closeout

Conversation

@ncipollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Re-read docs/packages/compono-tunit.md, docs/packages/index.md, skills/compono/references/tunit.md, SKILL.md end to end — fixed four stale spots still describing Compono.TUnit's Phase-0-only [Compose]/[Shared] shape, now that the full attribute family ([Compose<TProfile>]/[Compose<TProfile, TConfig>]) has shipped.
  • docs/roadmap/future-packages.md: moved Compono.TUnit out of "Roadmap items" into shipped-package language throughout (intro, Admission model, emptied Roadmap items section) — five-package count now matches docs/packages/index.md.
  • skills/compono-evals/evals.json: eval 20 checked directly and found already correct (it's an NUnit scenario, not TUnit). Added eval 21, a routing scenario confirming TUnit's own [Test]/[Compose<TProfile>] shape is used only when Compono.TUnit is referenced (not Compono.XunitV3's [Theory] syntax).
  • PLAN-0040 Phase 3 checked off, plan Status → Done. PLAN-0040 is now fully complete.

Docs/skill/eval-only change, no src/Compono.TUnit code.

Test plan

  • python3 -m json.tool skills/compono-evals/evals.json — valid JSON
  • Manual re-read of all touched docs for internal consistency

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Fixes four stale references to Compono.TUnit's old Phase-0-only
[Compose]/[Shared] shape (docs/packages/index.md, docs/packages/compono-tunit.md,
skills/compono/SKILL.md, skills/compono/references/tunit.md) now that the
full attribute family has shipped. Moves Compono.TUnit out of
docs/roadmap/future-packages.md's roadmap-item section into shipped-package
language, matching docs/packages/index.md's five-package count. Adds a
routing eval (skills/compono-evals/evals.json) confirming TUnit's own
[Test]/[Compose<TProfile>] shape is used only when Compono.TUnit is
referenced, not Compono.XunitV3's [Theory] syntax.

PLAN-0040 is now fully complete - all four phases done.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the type: docs Documentation change label Aug 12, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e4b64e4ce4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/plans/0040-compono-tunit-package-design.md
Comment thread skills/compono/SKILL.md
- docs/plans/README.md: PLAN-0040's index row was still In Progress
  after the plan itself moved to Done.
- skills/compono/SKILL.md: the Default workflow's call-site
  profile-configuration step routed exclusively to Compono.XunitV3,
  ignoring Compono.TUnit's identical [Compose<TProfile, TConfig>]
  capability - now routes to whichever package the project references.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ncipollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 56634f5caa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@ncipollina
ncipollina merged commit 432a67b into main Aug 12, 2026
8 checks passed
@ncipollina
ncipollina deleted the docs/plan-0040-phase3-tunit-closeout branch August 12, 2026 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: docs Documentation change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant