Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Before, if one of the intermediate XFOIL runs failed, the validation showed only the total ("breakdown N/A").
Now each line uses the best breakdown allowed by the runs that worked. The parts always add up exactly to the total:
(Mach first)(visc first)(Mach+visc combined)(breakdown N/A)With a single order, the split between Mach and viscosity can differ from the average by a few thousandths of Cl (up to 0.006 measured), hence the mark.
Other changes:
Breakdown(method used) anddCl_Mach_plus_Viscosity.Verified
(Mach first): -0.0097 - 0.0155 + 0.0748 = +0.0496 = total. The other 23 lines are identical to the previous PR.Depends on
#11 (base branch:
perf/vectorized-panel-method).