Skip to content

[RFP-09] IEI / Tokenfrastructure — Milestone 1 #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
zakaryaeboudittv wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+225 −0
Open

[RFP-09] IEI / Tokenfrastructure — Milestone 1 #60

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b804833
Add CPC-26-0016 Milestone 1 report
zakaryaeboudittv Aug 27, 2026
b26226a
Add CPC-26-0016 inception report
zakaryaeboudittv Aug 27, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
104 changes: 104 additions & 0 deletions docs/product-research/tokenfrastructure/milestone-1-inception-report.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
---
title: "IEI / Tokenfrastructure - Milestone 1 Inception Report"
sidebar_label: "Milestone 1 Inception Report"
sidebar_position: 2
---

# Milestone 1 Inception Report

*Research plan, methodology, evidence framework and audience segmentation*

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Project** | CPC-26-0016 - *Where the Story Holds: AI Commercial Positioning for Cardano* |
| **RFP** | RFP 09 - AI Commercial Positioning |
| **Prepared by** | Intelligence Economy Institute (IEI), part of Tokenfrastructure (TKNFRA) |
| **Project lead** | Zakaryae Boudi |
| **Scope** | Signed core scope of 76,000 ADA only |
| **Status** | Submitted for Milestone 1 review |

## 1. Purpose and Scope

The study will assess whether AI can support a credible commercial positioning for Cardano, for which use cases and audiences, and under which technical, adoption, and evidence conditions. The research will test the proposed institutional-grade agent integrity, accountability, and settlement position as a hypothesis rather than assume it as a conclusion.

This inception baseline covers the 76,000 ADA core scope stated in the signed agreement. It is designed to produce evidence-based findings on demand, technical credibility, current Cardano activity, competitive position, adoption pathways, and the resulting strategic recommendation.

### Core Research Questions

- Which AI-related problems and use cases present credible demand from identifiable buyers or adopters?
- Which Cardano technical properties are relevant to those problems, and what evidence supports the associated claims?
- What AI-related activity and capability currently exist within the Cardano ecosystem?
- How does Cardano compare with specialised AI chains, relevant protocols, and non-chain alternatives for the shortlisted use cases?
- What positioning and adoption pathway, if any, is supported by the evidence?

### Scope Boundary

- **Included:** the research and decision outputs within the signed 76,000 ADA core scope.
- **Excluded optional add-ons:** the extended institutional interview base, deep verification of one named deployment, and six-month follow-on tracking of recommendation conditions.
- **Also excluded:** AI product or protocol development, pilot execution, implementation work, and technical-roadmap authorship.

## 2. Research Plan and Methodology

The project will use a mixed-method, evidence-first design. Desk research will be combined with targeted primary research and verification of material technical, market, and ecosystem claims. The method will distinguish documented fact, respondent evidence, analytical inference, and vendor judgment.

| Research component | Method |
|--------------------|--------|
| **Demand and buyer evidence** | Review buyer problems, adoption conditions, decision criteria, and credible use cases through public evidence and targeted interviews. |
| **Competitive position** | Compare Cardano with relevant specialised AI networks, protocols, and non-chain alternatives at the use-case level. |
| **Technical credibility** | Test material claims concerning determinism, formal methods, identity, auditability, privacy, and settlement against inspectable evidence. |
| **Synthesis** | Integrate the evidence into a supported positioning assessment and a go, conditional-go, monitor, or no-go recommendation. |

### Initial Source Groups

- **Cardano and project evidence:** official documentation, technical artifacts, ecosystem project materials, usage evidence, and other inspectable sources.
- **Competitive evidence:** official technical and commercial materials for relevant AI networks, protocols, and non-chain alternatives.
- **Market and adoption evidence:** documented deployments, buyer announcements, procurement or adoption cases, and credible market research.
- **Standards and protocol evidence:** relevant sources concerning agent payments, identity, authorisation, auditability, settlement, and compliance.
- **Primary evidence:** structured interviews and expert discussions across the stakeholder groups identified below.

## 3. Evidence Framework and Credibility Ledger

Material claims will be recorded in a credibility ledger so that the basis, strength, and limits of each conclusion remain visible. Evidence that cannot be independently inspected will be identified as such and weighted accordingly.

| Ledger field | Purpose |
|--------------|---------|
| **Claim or question** | The proposition being tested and the research question it informs. |
| **Source** | Source reference, source type, and date. |
| **Evidence status** | Documented, respondent-reported, inferred, or vendor judgment. |
| **Validation** | Whether and how the evidence has been corroborated. |
| **Independence** | Cardano-connected, independent, or mixed evidence. |
| **Confidence** | High, medium, or low, based on source quality and consistency. |
| **Limitations** | Known gaps, contradictions, access constraints, or conditions. |

### Credibility Standards

- Material conclusions will be traceable to identified evidence or clearly labelled judgment.
- Technical capability will be distinguished from demonstrated deployment or adoption.
- Contradictory evidence and material limitations will be retained in the analysis.
- Confidence will reflect evidence quality, independence, recency, and corroboration.

### AI-use Approach

AI tools may support source discovery, organisation, coding, and drafting. They will not be treated as authoritative evidence. Material outputs will be reviewed by the project team, source references will be checked, and confidential or personal information will not be entered into unapproved tools. Material AI assistance will be disclosed where relevant.

## 4. Stakeholder and Audience Segmentation

| Segment | Research contribution |
|---------|-----------------------|
| **Institutional buyers and adopters** | Demand, decision criteria, risk, procurement, and evidence thresholds. |
| **AI-agent builders and platforms** | Use-case requirements, integration conditions, and infrastructure alternatives. |
| **Delivery and infrastructure partners** | Delivery feasibility, dependencies, and adoption routes. |
| **Cardano ecosystem and technical contributors** | Current activity, technical evidence, and ecosystem capability. |
| **Independent and non-Cardano experts** | Comparative evidence and control perspectives. |
| **CPC and Intersect** | Research commissioner, methodology alignment, and milestone review. |

## 5. Success Criteria and Milestone 1 Confirmation

- The research questions can be answered through a proportionate mix of primary and secondary evidence.
- Material findings can be traced through the credibility ledger to their supporting evidence and limitations.
- The analysis distinguishes technical capability, demonstrated activity, commercial demand, and strategic inference.
- The stakeholder groups provide sufficient perspectives to assess buyer credibility, delivery feasibility, and competitive position.
- The final recommendation is supported by evidence and can distinguish go, conditional-go, monitor, and no-go outcomes.

This report consolidates the contractual Milestone 1 elements: the inception report, research plan and methodology, evidence framework and credibility-ledger structure, and stakeholder and audience segmentation. The methodology may be refined following CPC and Intersect review without expanding the signed core scope.

121 changes: 121 additions & 0 deletions docs/product-research/tokenfrastructure/milestone-1.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
---
title: "IEI / Tokenfrastructure - Milestone 1"
sidebar_label: "Milestone 1"
sidebar_position: 1
---

# IEI / Tokenfrastructure - Milestone 1

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **RFP** | RFP 09 - AI Commercial Positioning |
| **Project** | CPC-26-0016 - *Where the Story Holds: AI Commercial Positioning for Cardano* |
| **Team / Organisation** | Intelligence Economy Institute (IEI), part of Tokenfrastructure (TKNFRA) |
| **Project lead** | Zakaryae Boudi |
| **Milestone number** | 1 of 4 |
| **Milestone name** | Inception & Scoping |
| **Reporting period** | 22 July 2026 - 6 August 2026 |
| **Report date** | 12 August 2026 |
| **Grant amount** | 76,000 ADA |
| **Amount claimed this milestone** | 7,600 ADA |
| **Cumulative amount claimed** | 7,600 ADA |

## Summary

Milestone 1 established the research questions, evidence-first methodology, credibility-ledger structure, source groups, success criteria, and stakeholder and audience segmentation for the study. The work tests Cardano's proposed AI commercial positioning as a hypothesis rather than assuming it as a conclusion. The supporting inception report consolidates all four contractual Milestone 1 deliverables.

The project lead also presented Milestone 1 at the Cardano Product Committee session on 19 August 2026, satisfying the attendance requirement for the first milestone.

## Milestone Description

**Description of the Services from Appendix A**

Refinement and validation of the research questions, evidence framework and success criteria; agreement of methodology, source list and audience segments; confirmation of the credibility standards and AI-use approach for the Project.

**Deliverables from Appendix A**

Inception report; agreed research plan and methodology; evidence framework and credibility ledger structure; stakeholder and audience segmentation.

## Deliverables

| # | Deliverable | Status | Link / Evidence |
|---|-------------|--------|-----------------|
| 1 | Inception report | Complete | [Milestone 1 Inception Report](./milestone-1-inception-report) |
| 2 | Agreed research plan and methodology | Complete | [Research plan and methodology](./milestone-1-inception-report#2-research-plan-and-methodology) |
| 3 | Evidence framework and credibility ledger structure | Complete | [Evidence framework and credibility ledger](./milestone-1-inception-report#3-evidence-framework-and-credibility-ledger) |
| 4 | Stakeholder and audience segmentation | Complete | [Stakeholder and audience segmentation](./milestone-1-inception-report#4-stakeholder-and-audience-segmentation) |

## Acceptance Criteria Met

### 1. Applicable RFP requirements and proposal commitments reflected in the research methodology

**Status:** Met.

The inception report establishes the research questions, evidence-first mixed-method methodology, initial source groups, credibility standards, AI-use approach, and stakeholder segments required to execute the agreed core study.

**Evidence:** [Milestone 1 Inception Report](./milestone-1-inception-report), Sections 1-4.

### 2. Kick-off completed and research plan and workspace are confirmed

**Status:** Met.

The Milestone 1 submission confirms the research plan, methodology, evidence framework, and stakeholder segmentation. The project workspace was established for delivery and evidence management.

**Evidence:** [Milestone 1 Inception Report](./milestone-1-inception-report), Sections 2-4.

### 3. Inception report created

**Status:** Met.

The inception report was submitted to the Cardano Product Committee and Intersect by email on 6 August 2026. It consolidates all four Milestone 1 deliverables and is reproduced in Markdown as part of this pull request.

**Evidence:** [Milestone 1 Inception Report](./milestone-1-inception-report).

## Evidence

- **Public Milestone 1 evidence:** [Milestone 1 Inception Report](./milestone-1-inception-report).
- **Email submission:** The inception report was submitted to the Cardano Product Committee and Intersect on 6 August 2026.
- **CPC presentation:** Zakaryae Boudi presented Milestone 1 at the Cardano Product Committee session on 19 August 2026.

## Quality & Testing

This milestone is a research-design deliverable; software testing is not applicable. Quality assurance comprised a scope cross-check against the signed agreement, proposal, and RFP; verification that each required Milestone 1 element was present; and an internal consistency review across the research questions, methodology, evidence framework, and stakeholder segmentation.

The report was reviewed for completeness, readability, and traceability. The evidence framework distinguishes documented fact, respondent-reported evidence, analytical inference, and vendor judgment, while retaining limitations and contradictory evidence. The AI-use approach is disclosed in the report, and the project team remains responsible for accuracy.

## Budget Update

The grant is contracted through fixed-price milestone tranches. Milestone 1 represents 10% of the 76,000 ADA core grant.

| Category | Budgeted (ADA) | Spent this period (ADA) | Cumulative spend (ADA) |
|----------|----------------|-------------------------|------------------------|
| Milestone 1 - Inception & Scoping | 7,600 | 7,600 | 7,600 |
| **Total** | **7,600** | **7,600** | **7,600** |

## Issues and Blockers

None.

## Plan for Next Milestone

Milestone 2 - Evidence Gathering is due on 15 September 2026. The next phase will gather and log primary and secondary evidence; assess evidence credibility; compare relevant competitors and alternatives; review Cardano activity evidence; conduct targeted interviews; and complete a mid-point checkpoint against the agreed framework.

The contractual outputs are a populated credibility ledger, competitive teardown, activity-evidence review, interview log, preliminary synthesis, and mid-point checkpoint note.

## Public Communication Summary

**Project purpose.** The project assesses whether AI can support a credible commercial position for Cardano, for which use cases and audiences, and under which technical, adoption, and evidence conditions.

**Milestone achievement.** Milestone 1 established the research questions, research plan and methodology, evidence framework and credibility-ledger structure, and stakeholder and audience segmentation for the study.

**Key takeaway.** The research tests Cardano's proposed AI positioning as a hypothesis rather than assuming it as a conclusion. Later recommendations will distinguish technical capability, demonstrated activity, commercial demand, and strategic inference.

**What comes next.** The next phase gathers and compares primary and secondary evidence across buyer demand, Cardano activity, technical credibility, and relevant alternatives.

## Attestation

I confirm that the information in this report is accurate and that the deliverables described have been completed as stated.

**Authorised signatory:** Zakaryae Boudi, Project Lead
**Date:** 12 August 2026