[saltyeg]

What

A GamepadScript that presses a button by its PlayStation name (triangle, cross, circle, square, share,
options, ps) now reaches the OpMode, which sees it under both names, as on the robot. Releasing it releases it.

Why

Gamepad.copy() is fromByteArray(other.toByteArray()); toByteArray carries only the Xbox names (a, b, x, y,
back, start, guide), and fromByteArray then sets the PlayStation names from them (updateButtonAliases; checked
with javap -c against RobotCore 12.0.0). So gamepad1.triangle = true in a script was silently dropped: the
OpMode saw neither triangle nor y. Teams with PS controllers write their code with PS names, so they write their
scripts that way too, and the test just doesn't press anything. We lost time on exactly this.

OpModeContext.beforeUserCode now stages the copy: the script's gamepad is copied to a staging Gamepad, each
PlayStation name is ORed into its Xbox twin there, and the staging copy is delivered with copy() as before. The
script's own gamepad is never written, so a button stays down exactly as long as the script holds it. Edge
detection (triangleWasPressed(), yWasPressed()) works under both names. GamepadScript's javadoc says either
name works.

How I tested it

• New test in IterativeOpModeRunnerTest: a script holds triangle for two ticks and taps share once; the OpMode
  sees triangle and y both down for exactly those ticks, back and share for the tap, and
  triangleWasPressed(), yWasPressed() and shareWasPressed() once each. Without the change it fails.

• ./gradlew :SimLoop:testDebugUnitTest --rerun: all pass. :examples:testDebugUnitTest and
  :SimLoop:desktop:test pass. The leak gate passes.

• ./gradlew test passes on my machine

• New or changed behaviour has a test

• If I touched docs or public javadoc: ./gradlew :SimLoop:docsSite passes

Checklist

• No robot-specific or season-specific code (SimLoop stays season-agnostic)
• Every new number says its unit, and its frame if it is a pose
• Any public API change is called out above (none)
• If an AI agent wrote some of this, a human has read the change and run the tests