Skip to content

Say that the CodeQL row's question is open, in the parity document (#26) #142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
iderex merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

Say that the CodeQL row's question is open, in the parity document (#26) #142

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/quality-parity.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ today no tick does.
| `ABI floor build` | Dropped | It exists so a plugin loads against the oldest server it claims to support, and nothing here loads into a host. |
| `Package (JPRM) / Build package` | Dropped | This repository ships no plugin, so there is no package to build. |
| `Package (JPRM) / Generate SBOM` | Kept in substance, moved out of the gate | A bill of materials is owed for anything downloadable, and this one is produced by the release build rather than by a check on a pull request. Issue #37 builds it and nothing in this tree produces one today. |
| `CodeQL` | Kept, retargeted | Static analysis of the runner's own source, in the language record `0001` chose rather than in C#. Two strings arrive here for it, the job's and the code-scanning upload's, and the section on which contexts arrive says which of the two a required set can hold. |
| `CodeQL` | Kept, retargeted | Static analysis of the runner's own source, in the language record `0001` chose rather than in C#. Two strings arrive here for it, the analysis job's `CodeQL (go)` and the code-scanning upload's `CodeQL`. Which of the two a required set can hold is open rather than decided below: the section on which contexts arrive separates the strings, and says of the upload name that the route which would decide it has not been walked. Issue #62 holds that walk. |
| `Analyze (csharp)` | Dropped as a name | The language-specific analysis job is replaced by the equivalent for this language rather than carried across under a name that describes nothing here. |
| `DCO sign-off` | Kept unchanged | Already in the tree, asserting the text at `DCO` on every non-merge commit. |
| `Deterministic PR-hygiene checks` | Kept, adapted | The class the other checks miss is the pull request itself, and one of the three refusals is this board's own invariant about a record moving with the code it describes. It is in the tree as the `pull request` job, judged in `internal/pullrequest/` and run from `.github/workflows/pull-request.yml`. |
Expand Down
Loading