Loader mock server

[tushar89]

No description provided.

[himanshuvirmani]

Object mapper can be a static final at the top as class variable. Infact static does not matter since class is singleton.. Lets keep it just final...

[nitinka]

Hi Himanshu,
Probably a late question. what is the need of creating your own mock server? Is need different than regular http mocking.
Isn't something like wiremock sufficient?

[tushar89]

Had a discussion with Balaji. There are some issues with wiremock wrt
scalability which is why we were instructed to do this.

Plus this service can be tweaked later to suit our needs specifically.

Adding Balaji for clarification.

Thanks,
Tushar

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Nitin Kumar Agarwal <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi Himanshu,
Probably a late question. what is the need of creating your own mock
server? Is need different than regular http mocking.
Isn't something like wiremock sufficient?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

[balajiarun]

Standalone wiremock is not scaling. So we are working on scalable mock server and to support more use cases
By mistake this is committed to loader repo, we will remove this mock server code from loader repo

Thanks
Balaji

[nitinka]

Balaji,
Would it be possible to share the issues you are facing in scaling Wiremock.
What kind of load are you generating ?
Given the traction on Wiremock, I would be more inclined to enhance/fix Wiremock. Though using it within organisation would be your call anyways.

Regards
Nitinka