Skip to content

ci: serialise mutation testing per ref, not repository-wide - #36

Merged
Mearman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/mutation-concurrency-per-ref
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

Mearman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/mutation-concurrency-per-ref

Conversation

@Mearman

@Mearman Mearman commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The mutation workflow's concurrency group was shared by every ref, so a queued run for one pull request was cancelled when another queued behind it, and the required mutation result check never appeared on the cancelled one. Scopes the group to the ref.

@Mearman

Mearman commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T22:16:20.894870Z 10ce5cb Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7b29466fd4

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@Mearman

Mearman commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@Mearman
Mearman force-pushed the ci/mutation-concurrency-per-ref branch from 7b29466 to d26964f Compare October 10, 2026 22:13
@Mearman

Mearman commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

A repository-wide concurrency group lets GitHub cancel a queued run when another pull request queues
behind it, which left the required mutation result check missing.
@Mearman
Mearman force-pushed the ci/mutation-concurrency-per-ref branch from d26964f to 10ce5cb Compare October 10, 2026 22:14
@Mearman

Mearman commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 10ce5cb26d

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@Mearman
Mearman merged commit 6c31107 into main Oct 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant