Skip to content

ci: pass the force flag to Stryker without a separator - #4

Merged
Mearman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/forward-force-to-stryker
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

Mearman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/forward-force-to-stryker

Conversation

@Mearman

@Mearman Mearman commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The mutation job on main ran the mutation script with an argument separator before the force flag. This repo's script calls stryker directly, with no task runner in between, so the separator reached Stryker as an extra argument and it exited with "too many arguments for 'run'". That failed Required Checks and skipped the release on the first merge. Passing the flag with no separator forwards it alone.

The mutation script runs stryker directly, so the argument separator
was forwarded as a stray argument and stryker rejected it on main.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-29T21:16:13.546803Z 1f52507 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Mearman
Mearman merged commit 7a4aa9f into main Sep 29, 2026
12 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant