-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Codebase cleanup #155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Codebase cleanup #155
Conversation
…istency and clarity + codebase decluttering
Summary of ChangesHello @Jakubk15, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a comprehensive codebase cleanup, primarily by refactoring repository method names for better consistency, standardizing delete operation return types, and reorganizing parcel-related services into a dedicated package. It also includes optimizations to caching mechanisms and enhancements to input validation, leading to a more robust and maintainable system. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request provides a significant codebase cleanup, improving consistency and maintainability. Key changes include standardizing repository method names (e.g., fetch to find), simplifying caching logic in ParcelServiceImpl, and improving return types for better clarity (e.g., delete methods now return a boolean). The introduction of null-checks and constants for magic values further enhances code quality.
However, I've identified two critical issues in ParcelServiceImpl related to asynchronous operations and data consistency that need to be addressed. One is a potential race condition in the send method's error handling, and the other is an incorrect order of operations in the collect method which could lead to item duplication.
src/main/java/com/eternalcode/parcellockers/parcel/service/ParcelServiceImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/com/eternalcode/parcellockers/parcel/service/ParcelServiceImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR performs a comprehensive refactoring of the codebase to improve consistency and code quality. The changes include renaming repository methods from fetch* to find*, changing return types from Optional<List<T>> to List<T>, and from Integer to Boolean for delete operations. Additionally, the PR reorganizes package structures by moving service classes into a dedicated service subpackage, removes unused caching layers, adds null validation checks, and introduces new constants for improved maintainability.
Key changes:
- Standardized repository method naming convention from
fetch*tofind*across all repositories - Changed delete method return types from
Integer(row count) toBoolean(success/failure) for clearer semantics - Simplified caching strategy in ParcelServiceImpl by removing sender/receiver-specific caches and relying on UUID-based cache only
- Added comprehensive null validation using
Objects.requireNonNull()andPreconditions.checkArgument()throughout service layer
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 22 out of 22 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| ParcelRepositoryIntegrationTest.java | Updated test to use renamed repository methods (findById, findByReceiver, findBySender) and removed unused imports |
| LockerRepositoryIntegrationTest.java | Updated test to use renamed repository methods (find, findPage) |
| ParcelSendTask.java | Updated import to reflect new service package structure |
| ParcelServiceImpl.java | Major refactoring: moved to service subpackage, added null validations, removed sender/receiver caches, added defensive copying of items, improved error handling with exceptionallyCompose, and extracted magic strings/numbers to constants |
| ParcelService.java | Moved to service subpackage and changed delete method return types from Integer to Boolean |
| ParcelDispatchService.java | Moved to service subpackage and removed obsolete comment |
| ParcelRepositoryOrmLite.java | Renamed methods from fetch* to find*, changed delete return types to Boolean, removed fetchPage method, added null validations, and improved pagination result immutability |
| ParcelRepository.java | Updated interface to reflect renamed methods, removed fetchAll, removed fetchPage, and changed delete return types |
| LockerRepositoryOrmLite.java | Renamed methods from fetch* to find* and removed unused fetchAll method |
| LockerRepository.java | Updated interface to reflect renamed methods and removed unused import |
| LockerManager.java | Removed unused getOrCreate method and updated method calls to use renamed repository methods |
| ParcelListGui.java | Changed comment from fixme to todo for known issue |
| GuiManager.java | Updated imports to reflect new service package structure |
| DeliveryRepositoryOrmLite.java | Renamed methods from fetch* to find* and changed delete return type to Boolean |
| DeliveryRepository.java | Updated interface to reflect renamed methods and changed types |
| DeliveryManager.java | Removed unused getOrCreate method and updated method calls |
| ParcelContentRepositoryOrmLite.java | Renamed fetch to find and changed delete return type to Boolean |
| ParcelContentRepository.java | Updated interface to reflect renamed methods and changed types |
| ParcelContentManager.java | Updated method calls to use renamed repository methods |
| MessageConfig.java | Added new databaseError notice message for database operation failures |
| DebugCommand.java | Updated import to reflect new service package structure |
| ParcelLockers.java | Updated imports and method calls to use renamed repository methods |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
src/main/java/com/eternalcode/parcellockers/parcel/service/ParcelServiceImpl.java:78
- The items list should be validated for null elements before cloning. If the items list contains null elements, this will throw a NullPointerException during the stream operation.
src/main/java/com/eternalcode/parcellockers/parcel/service/ParcelServiceImpl.java:118 - After a rollback failure, the method returns a failed future containing an exception, but the deletion result is not checked. If the rollback delete fails, the parcel may remain in the database while the user receives an error message. Consider logging the deletion result or handling the rollback failure explicitly.
src/main/java/com/eternalcode/parcellockers/parcel/service/ParcelServiceImpl.java:242 - When the cached value is null but a UUID needs to be invalidated, this creates unnecessary branching logic. The UUID should be invalidated directly since it's the same value.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
No description provided.