Skip to content

The with statement might be loosing accuracy? #9

Description

@Erotemic

It might be better to get timing information without the "with" statement.

See:

"""
Inspired by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XThL0LP3RjY
"""


def main():
    import timerit
    import ubelt as ub
    expected = "58178059833426840615453390153965"

    variants = dict(
        ne_01=expected[0: 0] + 'F' + expected[ 1:32],
        ne_16=expected[0:15] + 'F' + expected[16:32],
        ne_32=expected[0:31] + 'F' + expected[32:32],
        too_long='F' * len(expected) * 10,
        too_short='F',
    )

    ti = timerit.Timerit(1000000, bestof=10, verbose=2)

    for key, value in variants.items():
        for timer in ti.reset(key):
            value == expected

    print('ti.rankings = {}'.format(ub.repr2(
        ti.rankings['min'], nl=2, align=':', precision=12)))


if __name__ == '__main__':
    """
    CommandLine:
        python ~/misc/tests/python/test_equality_time.py
    """
    main()

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions