Skip to content

Conversation

@souro1212
Copy link
Member

This PR intentionally adds risky patterns for testing ai-secure-code-review-action.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@souro1212 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eadf57b and 21a3948.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/com/acme/DemoController.java (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/vuln-demo

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔐 Secure Code Review (AI)

Risk Summary: High (1), Medium (1)

  1. Finding: Potential Class Injection

    • Why it matters: The use of Class.forName(sort) with unvalidated input allows an attacker to control the class name being loaded, which can lead to arbitrary code execution or loading of unintended classes.
    • Evidence (diff lines):
      +    Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(sort);
    • Fix (concrete): Validate the sort parameter against a whitelist of allowed class names before passing it to Class.forName(). For example:
      if (!isValidSortParameter(sort)) {
          throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid sort parameter");
      }
  2. Finding: Lack of Input Validation

    • Why it matters: The sort parameter is directly accepted from user input without any validation or sanitization, which can lead to injection attacks or unexpected behavior.
    • Evidence (diff lines):
      +  public String items(@RequestParam String sort) throws Exception {
    • Fix (concrete): Implement input validation to ensure that sort only contains expected values (e.g., predefined sort options). For example:
      @RequestParam String sort) {
          if (!isValidSort(sort)) {
              throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid sort value");
          }
      }

Safeguards Checklist:

  • Input validation: Fail
  • Output encoding: N/A
  • Error handling: Fail
  • Secure coding practices: Fail
  • Use of safe libraries/frameworks: Pass

The diff is small and focused, but it introduces significant security risks that need to be addressed immediately.


Models can make mistakes. Verify before merging.

@secure-code-warrior-for-github

Micro-Learning Topic: Injection attack (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "injection attack"

Injection flaws, such as SQL, NoSQL, OS, and LDAP injection, occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker’s hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant