Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove exact polynomial productive widths for one homogeneous chronological compiler. Claim type: scoped written mathematical proof with exact finite corroboration. No new kappa or selected-frontier change.
The new step retains actual gcd cancellation, solving the existing width recurrence rather than tightening a generic count of rank products. It includes empty-root forests. At fixed height two with m=2,W=2,P=3, the rank-10 chain has source totals 8 and 18 and exact width 72; replacing LCM by maximum fails. The default formula is sharp on ranks m^h.
This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. It takes codyw912 / PR4638, Open next question 2 of research/adaptive-chronological-batching. Credit Mihir Srivastava / PR4507 for chronological batching, zxv / PR4436 and PR4483 for the forest, Jacob Alan Sussman for integer compilation, and Cinna Davis and Ryanson Jonathan for their retained native/flow lineage. PR5962 and JoyboyBrian's PR6086 supply different semigroup/shell-count improvements; their results are cited, not audited. LCM arithmetic and positional notation are classical; no literature-wide priority is claimed.
Advance CLAIM. Scientific base and refreshed canonical main are 7c49fe3, priority revision 8, selected PR6030. Only the six-file research/homogeneous-gcd-width package is added.
Evidence
From the worktree root, using the exact local interpreter path or another CPython 3.12 installation:
Expected markers are PASS_HOMOGENEOUS_GCD_WIDTH, PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE and PASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. The standalone checker writes no files.
Limitations and unrun obligations
The all-rank statement rests on the written proof and cited conditional chronological/native contracts. Finite arithmetic corroborates its stated domains. The symbolic inventory has one productive rank and only rank-one paid positions; the selected mixed-rank supplier is outside this theorem. The adaptive polynomial exponent is an upper bound, not an optimality claim. The default formula is exact only for this batching policy.
No native realization of this inventory, physical caller, finite generation-time bound, practical cutoff, storage extent, precision, stock or outer admission is provided. All five selected framework assumptions remain. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. The selected cold replay, native suites, Lean and Docker were not run. All registered package checks ran locally.
Open next questions
Related open work
No open PR computing this homogeneous chronological width sequence was identified in the refreshed live searches, main/merged searches and reservations. Cached overlap reported complete pagination for 555 open PRs and 6,599 discussion records. Sparse local notes, arbitrary historical diffs and unpublished work remain coverage limits.
The completion refresh inspected the 15 other open contributions created since the advance CLAIM, PR6605 through PR6611 and PR6613 through PR6620. None studies this homogeneous chronological width sequence or computes a conflicting value for the rank-10 example. No extra computations rechecked another contribution.
CI notes
Both hosted checks,
planandreplay (research/homogeneous-gcd-width), passed at exact head9df11284bcc652a272014f8d19ee7e0bc642ed6din run 41634549541: plan in 4m30s and replay in 1m32s. The completed checks were read once. Run metadata confirms success and the matching head.Hosted replay certifies execution of the registered finite checks and metadata checks, not independent mathematical or proof-kernel acceptance of the written theorem. All local registered, publication and export checks above passed. The completion refresh found no competing calculation of this width sequence; the limitations above remain.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: isolated.
Six new package files. Shared implementations, frozen predecessor evidence and selected records are unchanged.