Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration. This settles the nested-target case of JoyboyBrian / Brian's PR5020 Open next question 2: one prescribed partial injection extends to an invertible map meeting arbitrarily overlapping late sources and any finite flag of target capacities exactly when the cumulative-source compatibility and quotient-capacity conditions hold. The proof constructs a map and counts every completion over each finite field.
Separate tests can pass while the shared map is impossible. The new binary fixture has individual completion counts 4 and 12 and joint count zero. This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit JoyboyBrian / PR5020 for the question and one-capacity contract, Cao Yifan / intqwq / PR4610 for the native-map caller, Nick Petalas / PR4919 for the different three-subspace correspondence problem, codyw912 / PR4735, and the retained Cinna Davis, Dugongue, zxv and Jacob Alan Sussman lineage. Basis extension and finite-field independent-vector counts are classical; no general literature-priority claim is made. No predecessor scientific verifier was replayed.
Evidence
fdb7b8808ce89cd1738ea49dcd65c19ae1dddedd. The official export passes integrity/input-coverage checks; optimized execution in its read-only Git-free tree with an empty PATH reproduces the same receipt byte for byte.From the repository root, exactly:
Any CPython 3.12 executable may replace that local interpreter path. Expected direct marker:
PASS_NESTED_LATE_CAPACITY_COMPLETION. Each registered command has a 120-second limit. The verifier emits a generated JSON receipt bound to all seven package-file hashes and writes no files. There are no external live inputs or third-party dependencies.Limitations
This is unrestricted GL completion with nested target capacities. Arbitrary nonnested targets, symplectic constraints, absolute phases, actual selected-word contacts, native realization, causal access, dirty restoration, basis preparation, delivery, productive target debits and the complete paid invoice remain open. Precision, stock, tape, compiler, outer admission and all five selected framework assumptions remain. There is no new kappa or selected-frontier change. The reference software covers prime q in {2,3,5,7}, dimension at most six and at most eight contacts; the written proof has the stated all-field/all-length scope. No native build, selected scientific replay, Lean or Docker run was performed. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. No locally unrun registered check is deferred to CI.
Open next questions
Related open work
The refreshed corpus covers 438 open PR bodies and 6,420 Discussion records with complete reported remote pagination; local note coverage is 130 of 8,917 notes. The live open-PR corpus and current claims were searched for prescribed-map, nested-capacity and simultaneous-subspace work. No other open PR stating this nested-capacity completion theorem was found in that coverage; sparse historical notes, arbitrary diffs and unpublished work remain limits. The current account submissions above are context, not targets for a counterpart or follow-up.
CI notes
Both hosted checks,
planandreplay (research/nested-late-capacity-completion), passed at exact headfdb7b8808ce89cd1738ea49dcd65c19ae1dddeddin run 41555972847. The completed checks were read once: plan took 4m23s and replay took 1m36s. Separate run metadata confirms completed success and the matching commit. The registered replay executes both normal and optimized scientific checks. Local scientific, metadata, committed-byte/source-history and read-only export checks also passed. Hosted execution certifies the bounded registered execution, not independent scientific acceptance or formal proof-kernel verification of the universal proof.The completion refresh inspected all fourteen other open account PRs created since the advance CLAIM and added PR6494 above. No other inspected submission states this nested-capacity GL completion count; no additional computations were run to audit another result or compare unshared quantities.
Advance CLAIM. The publication base is
7c49fe32c55de02c2c873655c804b16e4c3fef0a, priority revision 8, selected PR6030. The original coverage-law card is explicitly changed to this algebraic shared-map prerequisite.Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: isolated package. Seven new files are added under
research/nested-late-capacity-completion/. Shared code, predecessor packages and the selected frontier are unchanged.