Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The complete composed PR5221 scientific replay has a 33.75% lower median local runtime with identical output. Claim type: scoped implementation-equivalence proof, exact finite conformance and a measured replay-time improvement. No new mathematical repair rank or kappa.
The optional seven-file package is
research/quinary-forward-rank/. It authenticates six source inputs, changes exactly one function binding, and retains the complete primary main block, independent body, typed receipt, fixtures and rejection controls. Both source bodies run sequentially in one fresh process in each timed mode. This measures the complete composed scientific consumer; shared package-runner/CI planning costs and two separate interpreter startups are outside the measurement.Produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Brian / JoyboyBrian PR5221 for the full repair law and both scientific consumers, with Ali Romman PR4962, Nick Petalas PR5173, mikey1201 PR172, icekylinx PR144 and the retained tensor/deletion lineage. Gaussian elimination is classical; the source-bound implementation and complete-consumer evidence are the new contribution. No predecessor mathematical claim is being audited.
Advance CLAIM. Base and submission refresh are canonical main
7c49fe32c55de02c2c873655c804b16e4c3fef0a, priority revision 8, selected PR6030.Evidence
e72837b58f04bbbb7414402062a2f8db3e3a0b0f, committed bytes, modes and full source-history preflight pass for thirteen package/input files. Official export integrity and declared-input checks pass. Normal and optimized read-only Git-free replay pass with empty PATH; all fourteen exported files remain byte-identical. An actual mutated exported source is rejected before execution.From the repository root, standard library only:
Any CPython 3.12 installation may replace the displayed interpreter. Expected markers are
PASS_QUINARY_FORWARD_RANK,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. README.md gives the complete measurement command with an external exclusive output path.Limitations and unrun obligations
The evaluator is rank-only over F5, at most 256 rows and columns and 64-bit integer inputs. Its written equivalence proof is outside a formal kernel. The independent command is retained without optimization. Default adoption and historical source-pin migration are not implemented. This adds one isolated optional package; predecessor files and the selected frontier are unchanged.
Native maps, physical callers, ownership/restoration, routing, precision/tape, stock, compiler and outer admission remain outside scope. Lean, Docker, heavy native builds and the selected scientific cold replay were not run. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. No complete multiplication theorem or new kappa is supplied.
Open next questions
Can the evaluator be adopted in the default consumer while preserving historical source pins? First specify the migration and retain both full scientific bodies and the typed receipt. Default integration is missing; no further optimization is reserved.
Related open work
No other open PR studying the PR5221 characteristic-five consumer or its rank evaluator appeared in the complete-pagination cached scan, live topic searches, refreshed open list or recent claims. PR5221 is the merged predecessor. The earlier PR6135 DisjointTensor serialization optimization has a different compiler, consumer and representation; this contribution is not its follow-up. Sparse historical notes, arbitrary diffs and unpublished work remain coverage limits. No extra computations were run to compare other contributors' mathematical results.
The completion refresh inspected all thirteen account open PRs created since the advance CLAIM, including this PR (#6459 through #6471). The twelve others study distinct objects or consumers; none was found to study this PR5221 rank evaluator or report a conflicting common-instance value. The two adjacent runtime submissions are listed above. No additional computations checked another contribution.
CI notes
Both hosted checks passed at exact head
e72837b58f04bbbb7414402062a2f8db3e3a0b0fin run 41551184139: plan in 4m29s and replay (research/quinary-forward-rank) in 1m19s. The completed checks were read once; run metadata confirms completed status, success and the matching head.Hosted replay passed the registered warning-strict normal and optimized conformance commands and source metadata checks. All direct and registered local checks, committed-byte/source-history/mode preflights and read-only Git-free export checks also pass. The timing experiment remains local evidence; CI does not measure a portable speedup or establish independent scientific acceptance of the written equivalence argument. No hosted failure remains to report.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: isolated. Seven new files in one optional research package; no shared code, frozen predecessor, pinned evidence or selected record is modified. Archival merge and scientific acceptance remain separate.