⚡ Bolt: 렌더링 최적화를 위한 DOM 엘리먼트 템플릿 캐싱 추가 - #462
Conversation
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesDOM 템플릿 캐싱
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact head |
|
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
- Introduces unattached DOM node caching via `cloneNode(false)` in `createOwnerCellContent`, `createStatusCellContent`, and `createActualProgressCellContent`. - Reduces JS-to-C++ allocation overhead in O(N) rendering loops. - Fixes redundant class assignment and adds inline comments explaining the rationale.
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head58514a2af687db02c62603f9deab6376a2abf208. -
Head SHA:
58514a2af687db02c62603f9deab6376a2abf208 -
Workflow run: 31701407431
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
|
Closing as superseded by #466. This branch duplicates the owner/status/progress template-caching direction, but its current effective diff also downgrades Hono to #466 is the replacement line and will be restacked on current protected |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
1 participant
💡 무엇을
app.js내의 셀 컨텐츠 생성 함수(createOwnerCellContent,createStatusCellContent,createActualProgressCellContent)에서 사용되는 DOM 요소들을 템플릿(Template)으로 캐싱하여 재사용하도록 개선했습니다.document.createElement()를 호출하는 대신, 초기 1회만 DOM 객체를 생성하고 이후에는.cloneNode(false)를 사용해 복제합니다.🎯 왜
document.createElement()를 호출하면 JS엔진과 브라우저의 C++ 렌더러를 넘나드는 브릿지 오버헤드가 누적됩니다.createTreeCellContent,createEmptyCell,renderTaskRow등 일부 함수들에는 템플릿 캐싱 기법이 적용되어 있었으나, 담당자 배지, 상태 배지, 그리고 실적진척상태 렌더링 등 일부 핫 패스(Hot Path)에는 적용되어 있지 않아 성능 개선의 여지가 있었습니다.📊 영향
🔬 측정
npm run test:e2e)를 통해 모든 변경사항에 따른 회귀 결함이 없음을 검증 완료했습니다.PR created automatically by Jules for task 6535079073732660272 started by @seonghobae
Summary by CodeRabbit