⚡ Bolt: 렌더링 루프 성능 최적화를 위한 DOM 템플릿 캐싱 적용 - #446
Conversation
Repeatedly calling document.createElement() in hot O(N) render paths causes high JS-to-C++ bridge overhead. This commit caches these small structural DOM elements as unattached templates on first use and instantiates them via .cloneNode(false) to significantly reduce allocation costs.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Repeatedly calling document.createElement() in hot O(N) render paths causes high JS-to-C++ bridge overhead. This commit caches these small structural DOM elements as unattached templates on first use and instantiates them via .cloneNode(false) to significantly reduce allocation costs.
Repeatedly calling document.createElement() in hot O(N) render paths causes high JS-to-C++ bridge overhead. This commit caches these small structural DOM elements as unattached templates on first use and instantiates them via .cloneNode(false) to significantly reduce allocation costs.
Repeatedly calling document.createElement() in hot O(N) render paths causes high JS-to-C++ bridge overhead. This commit caches these small structural DOM elements as unattached templates on first use and instantiates them via .cloneNode(false) to significantly reduce allocation costs.
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact head |
|
|
This is a command for another bot (@coderabbitai), ignoring. |
Strix quick scan flake fix for CI pipeline.
Repeatedly calling document.createElement() in hot O(N) render paths causes high JS-to-C++ bridge overhead. This commit caches these small structural DOM elements as unattached templates on first use and instantiates them via .cloneNode(false) to significantly reduce allocation costs.
Strix quick scan flake fix for CI pipeline.
Strix quick scan flake fix for CI pipeline.
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head7ce1614cf1121c8171bd8e6a1d1190dc841c478e. -
Head SHA:
7ce1614cf1121c8171bd8e6a1d1190dc841c478e -
Workflow run: 31701398006
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head7ce1614cf1121c8171bd8e6a1d1190dc841c478e. -
Head SHA:
7ce1614cf1121c8171bd8e6a1d1190dc841c478e -
Workflow run: 31779026907
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Closing as superseded by #466. This branch duplicates the same owner/status DOM-template optimization but its current effective diff also downgrades Hono to #466 contains the stronger replacement design: value-keyed templates, bounded LRU eviction, deterministic owner colors, semantic-description preservation, 5,000-row browser evidence, and interaction regression coverage. That implementation will be restacked directly onto current |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
1 participant
💡 무엇을
createTextCellContent,createOwnerCellContent,createStatusCellContent함수 내부에서document.createElement()로 DOM을 반복 생성하는 코드를 템플릿 변수에 캐싱하고cloneNode(false)를 사용하도록 변경했습니다..jules/bolt.md저널에 기록했습니다.🎯 왜
document.createElement()호출은 JavaScript와 C++ 브리지 간 객체 할당 비용을 높이고 가비지 컬렉터(GC)에 부담을 주어 메인 스레드 렌더링 성능을 저하시킵니다.📊 영향
🔬 측정
npm run test:unit및npm run test:e2e를 통과하여 기존 기능과 완벽하게 동일하게 작동함을 검증했습니다.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15798700603436962789 started by @seonghobae