ci(security): update CodeQL init and analyze to 4.37.5 - #425
ci(security): update CodeQL init and analyze to 4.37.5#425dependabot[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Bumps [github/codeql-action/analyze](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](github/codeql-action@8aad20d...f205ea1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github/codeql-action/analyze dependency-version: 4.37.4 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 32 seconds Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Comment |
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exact-head review: this is a single-workflow supply-chain update. Both CodeQL init and analyze are pinned to the same immutable v4.37.5 release commit, avoiding version drift and mutable tags. Approved subject to required checks and an exact-head base update after the Hono security PR lands.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exact-head workflow review reconfirmed. CodeQL initialization and analysis are pinned to the same immutable v4.37.5 commit, the JavaScript/TypeScript and Python matrix is preserved, and permissions remain least-privilege. No actionable finding remains.
|
@coderabbitai review Protected commercial-readiness pass reconfirmed exact head |
|
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
b16332d9ab5ab5a31bf3401e2672fedfcd428c41. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Security Scan/trivy-fs: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/scopeweave/actions/runs/30891648053/job/91934866348)
- trivy-fs check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/scopeweave/actions/runs/30891648053/job/91934866348)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: codeql.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: codeql.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: codeql.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: codeql.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
|
|
A newer version of github/codeql-action/analyze exists, but since this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot I haven't updated it. You'll get a PR for the updated version as normal once this PR is merged. |
|
Superseded by #474. That current-base successor preserves this PR’s paired |
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
Summary
Update both CodeQL workflow entry points to the current v4.37.5 release commit:
github/codeql-action/initgithub/codeql-action/analyzeBoth actions are pinned to the immutable release commit
d1ba80a13dd99fba24a470575428917156a28b43.Why 4.37.5
The original Dependabot proposal targeted 4.37.4, but CodeQL Action 4.37.5 was released on 2026-08-03. It fixes a failure mode where a network interruption while streaming the CodeQL bundle could terminate
initinstead of falling back to a complete download before extraction.Scope
This PR changes only
.github/workflows/codeql.yml. It consolidates and supersedes #427 soinitandanalyzecannot drift onto different CodeQL Action releases.Merge requirements
Merge only after exact-head repository checks, central required workflows, and an independent approval succeed.