Skip to content

perf(network-graph): preserve memoization hypothesis under canonical owner - #1622

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 9 commits into
bolt-network-graph-array-slice-opt-940723605076515847from
bolt/memoize-network-graph-12874719642159281106
Draft

perf(network-graph): preserve memoization hypothesis under canonical owner#1622
seonghobae wants to merge 9 commits into
bolt-network-graph-array-slice-opt-940723605076515847from
bolt/memoize-network-graph-12874719642159281106

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Current authority — 2026-09-10

  • base owner: #1593@9a299c0b665808ff1602624a996a1663c4fb0e74
  • exact head: 776da9f409a95b21c3ce74758589ae17bb8b34c1
  • lifecycle: Draft / NetworkGraph memoization-hypothesis provenance / zero effective delta / do not merge independently

The prior provenance head 692cde5... had become stale after canonical NetworkGraph owner #1593 advanced to 9a299c0... while adopting the current #1623 security ancestry. Ordinary two-parent successor 776da9f... keeps 692cde5... as first parent, adopts current #1593 as second parent, and points at the exact current #1593 tree. The branch advanced with force=false.

Fresh PR metadata reports zero changed files against the current #1593 base. No NetworkGraph implementation, test, CHANGELOG, or performance claim is owned here. The old memoization idea remains provenance only; it must not be promoted without a measured reality RED and buyer-visible performance evidence that preserves graph correctness and lifecycle behavior.

Historical checks/reviews do not transfer to this new exact head. Retain Draft until protected integration proves the complete-successor condition for any eventual zero-delta closure. No duplicate source, dummy commit, force push, self-approval, or gate weakening.

vis-network 라이브러리를 인스턴스화하는 무거운 시각화 컴포넌트인 NetworkGraph가
부모 상태(레이아웃 등) 변경에 의해 불필요하게 다시 렌더링되어
CPU 병목 및 레이아웃 스래싱을 일으키는 문제를 방지하기 위해 React.memo로 감쌌습니다.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-09T01:55:18.004242Z 4dd3a96 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

seonghobae and others added 2 commits September 9, 2026 01:49
vis-network 라이브러리를 인스턴스화하는 무거운 시각화 컴포넌트인 NetworkGraph가
부모 상태(레이아웃 등) 변경에 의해 불필요하게 다시 렌더링되어
CPU 병목 및 레이아웃 스래싱을 일으키는 문제를 방지하기 위해 React.memo로 감쌌습니다.
@seonghobae seonghobae changed the title ⚡ Bolt: [성능 개선] NetworkGraph 컴포넌트 React.memo 적용 perf(network-graph): evaluate parent-rerender memoization Sep 9, 2026
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from develop to bolt-network-graph-array-slice-opt-940723605076515847 September 9, 2026 01:50
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2026 01:51
seonghobae and others added 2 commits September 9, 2026 01:57
vis-network 라이브러리를 인스턴스화하는 무거운 시각화 컴포넌트인 NetworkGraph가
부모 상태(레이아웃 등) 변경에 의해 불필요하게 다시 렌더링되어
CPU 병목 및 레이아웃 스래싱을 일으키는 문제를 방지하기 위해 React.memo로 감쌌습니다.
@seonghobae seonghobae changed the title perf(network-graph): evaluate parent-rerender memoization perf(network-graph): preserve memoization hypothesis under canonical owner Sep 9, 2026
Preserve #1622 generated/memoization provenance as first-parent history, adopt current #1593 as second parent, and point to the exact canonical owner tree so this lane remains zero-delta while the measurement hypothesis stays auditable in ancestry.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Preserve #1622 memoization provenance as first-parent history, adopt current canonical #1593 with the restored per-iterator regression as second parent, and keep zero effective source delta.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Preserve #1622's hypothesis provenance as first-parent history and adopt current #1593 exactly. This remains zero-effective-delta until measured evidence justifies promoting memoization.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
…vening writer

The branch advanced after the prior reconciliation with another memoization commit that reintroduced the unmeasured React.memo/layout-thrashing claim and, relative to #1622, also removed inherited security-floor tests and changed dependency/NetworkGraph source. Preserve that intervening commit as first-parent provenance, adopt current canonical provenance owner #1622 as second parent, and restore #1622's exact tree. No performance or dependency/security source remains independently owned by this lane.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant