Skip to content

chore(network-graph): preserve scope-repair provenance - #1614

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 7 commits into
bolt-network-graph-array-slice-opt-940723605076515847from
codex/pr1593-scope-repair
Draft

chore(network-graph): preserve scope-repair provenance#1614
seonghobae wants to merge 7 commits into
bolt-network-graph-array-slice-opt-940723605076515847from
codex/pr1593-scope-repair

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Current authority — 2026-09-10

The prior provenance head bd77f45... was stale after canonical NetworkGraph owner #1593 advanced. Ordinary two-parent successor a724004... preserves the old #1614 lineage as first parent, adopts current #1593 as second parent, and points at the exact current #1593 tree. The branch advanced with force=false and is again mergeable.

Fresh PR metadata reports zero changed files against current #1593. No duplicate NetworkGraph implementation, test, CHANGELOG, or performance authority remains in this lane. Historical checks/reviews do not transfer to this new exact head.

Retain Draft until protected integration proves complete semantic succession before any zero-delta closure. No force push, destructive rebase, dummy commit, self-approval, or gate weakening.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Review only exact head 0de33a1409d5f582a8adcee6a8cecdf30c07db5b as the scope-repair successor to #1593. Verify that the NetworkGraph bounded-loop delta is preserved and that unrelated .jules/bolt.md and CHANGELOG additions are removed. Do not transfer predecessor approval or treat skipped checks as approval.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T11:34:56.139808Z 0de33a1 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 0de33a1409

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@seonghobae seonghobae changed the title chore: remove unrelated performance notes chore(network-graph): preserve scope-repair provenance Sep 8, 2026
@seonghobae seonghobae added maintenance priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work type: maintenance Maintenance, build, dependency, or operational upkeep labels Sep 8, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
Preserve #1614 provenance as first parent, adopt current #1593 as second parent, and point the tree to the canonical owner's exact scope-repaired tree. No duplicate NetworkGraph, governance, or release-note delta remains.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Preserve #1614 provenance as first parent, adopt current canonical #1593 with the restored per-iterator regression as second parent, and keep zero effective source delta.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Preserve #1614's provenance as first-parent history and adopt current #1593 exactly. This remains zero-effective-delta.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

maintenance priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work type: maintenance Maintenance, build, dependency, or operational upkeep

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant