docs(agents): add exact-head PR playbook - #1558
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Record required skills, isolated worktree practice, evidence-backed verification, succession rules, and truthful attribution. Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Important Approval pendingCodeRabbit has no unresolved comments, but it has not reviewed the latest commit. Use the checkbox below to review the latest commit. CodeRabbit will approve the changes if it finds no blocking issues.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 31334f9eb7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Add portable fallbacks, scope mutation steps away from review-only agents, align robot evidence with the active gate, and cite NIST SSDF. Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Route same-head infrastructure retries through existing runs or one official central scheduler dispatch, and preserve source history when the organization Actions queue is already verified. Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3d9ea27d42
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Permit bounded validation for truncated GitHub responses and distinguish generated merge refs from AI-authored commits. Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e5c5eee140
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Current ref evidence: |
|
#1566의 exact head |
|
정정: 계승 PR #1566의 실제 원격 exact head는 |
Current exact state
develop@042b0c70531b229af3acbd0421a2f23098d848b3e5c5eee14050db40ae54ac1b33319b8c2feb7478AGENTS.mdonlyThis lane documents the exact-head PR execution playbook, repository-local skill usage, CodeGraph availability fallback, bounded retry behavior, succession rules, review-only agent separation, and truthful commit/merge-ref provenance.
Fresh verification distinguishes authored branch commits from GitHub generated merge refs. The actual head commit
e5c5eee...contains bothAssisted-by: OpenAI CodexandSigned-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>. Findings that treated generated PR merge refs (0405b8b...,d2ab066...) as authored branch heads were answered with current commit-object evidence and resolved. The current source also retains bounded validation retries for truncated API/archive responses and keeps CodeGraph/shared-skill requirements conditional when unavailable.Author-side governance tests (
35 passed) and diff-check evidence remain useful source evidence, not protected merge authority. CodeRabbit review capacity is currently exhausted and the live Naruon ruleset still requires one approval, dismisses stale reviews, requires thread resolution and last-push approval, with no bypass actor. Keep this PR Draft until one unchanged head has every then-live hosted required check terminal-success and effective governance is satisfiable without fabricated/self approval.No no-op requeue commit, self-approval, bot-as-human substitution, gate weakening, admin bypass, force-push, destructive rebase, or predecessor evidence transfer.