docs(gap-baseline): refresh to the 2026-08-25T12:23:29Z single-pass observation - #1397
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…bservation Regenerated from one fresh observation against main@b4bda4fa, superseding the closed #1394 snapshot whose basis had already been overtaken by the #1385 merge at 12:10:33Z. Records the ten-PR queue (including the new TEPP adapter-contract boundary PR #1395), the 25-issue count, protected- main integration of #1385/#1387/#1279/#1367 plus the previously-listed #1345/#1029/#1005, and the diagnosed Strix provider-rate-limit failure mode with its rerun resolution.
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 45 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| At this observation, GitHub REST enumerated **10 open pull requests** | ||
| (`#1395, #1382, #1380, #1379, #1378, #1376, #1373, #1370, #1363`, plus one | ||
| further PR whose enumeration raced the snapshot) and **25 open issues**. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Contradictory open-PR counts in same section
The refreshed snapshot reports 10 open pull requests, but the retained paragraph still states the queue "collapsed from 74 to 6" (product-technical-gap-baseline.md). The section now carries two conflicting current counts.
Prompt for agents
The refreshed Section 7 now states 10 open pull requests as of 2026-08-25T12:23:29Z, but the retained paragraph at docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:290-291 still claims the open-PR queue collapsed from 74 to 6. These two current-state counts contradict each other within the same section. Reconcile by updating or removing the stale '74 to 6' paragraph so the document reflects a single consistent snapshot count.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| recurring **Strix provider-infrastructure failure mode** was diagnosed across | ||
| seven PRs: the scan itself reported zero vulnerabilities but the gate failed | ||
| closed on NVIDIA-NIM rate-limit signals; all seven failing jobs were rerun and | ||
| passed, confirming the failures were environmental rather than findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
Closing this point-in-time baseline unmerged. Fresh protected main is now |
Supersedes #1394 (closed as internally stale by review).
Summary
Regenerated
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdfrom one fresh observation against protectedmain@b4bda4faat 2026-08-25T12:23:29Z — no mixed-time state:Testing
Documentation-only change; no runtime code touched.