forked from vibemafiaclub/argos
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
⚡ Bolt: [성능 개선] 핫 패스에서 Object.keys를 for...in으로 교체 및 안전성 보강 #539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
seonghobae
wants to merge
1
commit into
developmental
from
perf/optimize-gc-for-in-3793367124654121444
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -394,19 +394,21 @@ export async function getWeeklyReport( | |
| // Insights — delegation | ||
| // ⚡ Bolt Optimization: | ||
| // 병목 지점: 기존 코드는 `thisWeekRollups`를 3번 순회하고, 매 순회마다 Object.values()로 중간 배열을 생성하여 메모리 할당 비용이 발생했습니다. | ||
| // 최적화 방법: 단일 for...of 루프와 Object.keys() 순회를 결합하여 N+1 순회를 1회 순회로 통합하고 중간 배열 할당을 제거했습니다. | ||
| // 기대 효과: `thisWeekRollups`의 크기가 클 경우, 불필요한 배열 생성 오버헤드와 O(N) 순회를 1/3로 줄여 리포트 생성 성능이 향상됩니다. | ||
| // 최적화 방법: 단일 for...of 루프와 for...in 순회를 결합하여 배열 할당을 완전히 제거하고 N+1 순회를 1회로 통합했습니다. | ||
| // 기대 효과: `thisWeekRollups`의 크기가 클 경우, 불필요한 배열 생성 오버헤드 및 O(N) 순회를 1/3로 줄이고 GC 오버헤드를 대폭 감소시켜 리포트 생성 성능이 향상됩니다. | ||
|
Comment on lines
+397
to
+398
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
| let totalAgentCalls = 0 | ||
| let totalSkillCalls = 0 | ||
| const distinctSkillsThisWeek = new Set<string>() | ||
|
|
||
| for (const r of thisWeekRollups) { | ||
| for (const k of Object.keys(r.agentCounts)) { | ||
| totalAgentCalls += r.agentCounts[k] | ||
| for (const k in r.agentCounts) { | ||
| if (Object.hasOwn(r.agentCounts, k)) totalAgentCalls += r.agentCounts[k] | ||
| } | ||
| for (const k of Object.keys(r.skillCounts)) { | ||
| totalSkillCalls += r.skillCounts[k] | ||
| distinctSkillsThisWeek.add(k) | ||
| for (const k in r.skillCounts) { | ||
| if (Object.hasOwn(r.skillCounts, k)) { | ||
| totalSkillCalls += r.skillCounts[k] | ||
| distinctSkillsThisWeek.add(k) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 Info: Own-key behavior remains equivalent
for...inwithObject.hasOwnpreservesObject.keyscoverage. Key order cannot alter these sums, and ranked results are sorted afterward.Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.