feat: add governed performance review packet - #44
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
Changes성과 검토 증거 패킷
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~60 minutes Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to The governed performance review packet and digest validation pass the supplied package and security checks, but the PR is not merge-ready because the required Strix check has not produced a terminal successful result and qualifying independent approval is missing. Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Builder as build_performance_review_packet
participant Packet as PerformanceReviewPacket
participant Export as canonical_json
participant Digest as sha256_digest
Builder->>Packet: 검증된 입력으로 패킷 생성
Packet->>Packet: UTC 시각 고정 및 HMAC 봉인 등록
Export->>Packet: 발행 봉인과 현재 페이로드 검증
Packet-->>Export: 검증된 canonical JSON 반환
Digest->>Export: canonical UTF-8 JSON 요청
Export-->>Digest: canonical JSON 반환
Digest-->>Builder: SHA-256 다이제스트 반환
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 57.89% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 76 functions across 7 files. (4 skipped: 4 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent Please independently review exact current head |
|
@opencode-agent Please independently review the current exact head |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@opencode-agent Explicit review-only request for this Draft PR through the now-integrated draft exact-head dispatch path. Consumer |
seonghobae
added
enhancement
ChatGPT Codex Connector
1 participant
Buyer-visible outcome
Adds a governed, value-minimized performance-review evidence packet for accountable human review workflows. It correlates authoritative-lookup references for Person, Employment, Job, cycle, criteria, goals, criterion observations, optional development planning, reviewer, purpose/reason, evidence version, and business review period without carrying rating values, free-form feedback, or model-generated decision text. Independently supplied UUIDv4-shaped references are not treated as proof of opacity: until authoritative provenance resolves them, the packet conservatively records that direct person identifiers may be present and requires purpose-bound handling plus authoritative scope resolution before rating.
Latest Orgmetra-owned integrity repair
The newly verified defect was a seal-loss lifecycle reset. The prior single-use defense correctly rejected a second
__post_init__()while_PACKET_SEALS[id(packet)]still existed, but_PACKET_SEALSalso acted as the only "already issued" marker. If the process-local seal bytes were lost or discarded while the same packet remained live, a low-level caller could rewrite a field to another otherwise-valid value and invoke__post_init__()to install replacement evidence, minting a second canonical truth for one live packet identity.A realistic regression landed first on test-only head
721f13e7d432c1c96fb4aadd88226f1038891769. Performance Review Quality run33299443351, job99224652811checked out that exact head and failedtest_seal_loss_cannot_reset_live_issuance_lifecyclewith 1 failed / 87 passed andDID NOT RAISE ValueError, proving that seal loss reset issuance eligibility.The root repair on exact head
dbe465daad3c4ec60a2328046d09a93b1b9e67ecseparates current seal bytes from issuance lifecycle. A weak live-issued-identity registry records that the exact live packet has already issued even when current seal bytes are absent;_register_packet_seal()therefore fails closed on reinitialization of that same live object. Seal loss continues to make canonical export unavailable, but it no longer grants permission to issue again. Weak identity tracking releases with object lifetime rather than becoming durable process state. README, ADR 0018, traceability, package CHANGELOG, and regression tests describe the same boundary.This mechanism remains in-process mutation defense-in-depth only. It is not a hostile-interpreter capability boundary, portable/durable digital signature or attestation, distributed uniqueness service, authorization record, immutable audit/outbox, persistence proof, or rehydration credential.
Exact-current-head evidence
dbe465daad3c4ec60a2328046d09a93b1b9e67ecdevelop@9e3e4847510e1e612b48474ba42b177b8ed824df33299568467, job99224997471: terminal SUCCESS; exact checkout; 88/88 tests passed; owned package production 194/194 statements and 58/58 branches = 100.00%; compile and clean-checkout evidence are GREEN33299568500: terminal SUCCESS33299568464: terminal SUCCESS33299568495: terminal SUCCESS33299568489: OSV, Trivy, and Scorecard are GREEN, but dependency-review job99224997764is terminal FAILURE. Exact checkout succeeds; the exact dependency-graph comparison for base9e3e484…and headdbe465d…returns HTTP 403, so the pinned Dependency Review action is skipped and no dependency-review verdict exists. Existing dedicated-owner handoffContextualWisdomLab/.github#810owns that support/configuration boundary.33299567506, job99225037358: terminal FAILURE because no authenticatedopencode-agent/opencode-agent[bot]formalAPPROVEDorCHANGES_REQUESTEDreview exists for this exact head. The required check correctly refuses to stand in for the review. Existing owner handoffContextualWisdomLab/.github#624owns the review-plane boundary.33299567503, attempt 2, replacement job99336159056: GitHub records terminal SUCCESS, but this is deliberately treated as non-passing review evidence. Trusted central sourceContextualWisdomLab/.github@1ff8268255b061461d9d49b4cab4febf9a8e7bfa, repository-scoped reviewer credentials, target visibility, 5/5 provider-secret checks, and pinnedcontextual-orchestrator@30c6d71680e659f25a0a433d4726ad0d437f9757all materialize. The known endpoint-feed HTTP 413 falls back to the live OpenRouter feed; the sidecar reaches/healthz+ provider-route, passes gatewaychat/completionspreflight, and reports three runtime-ready NVIDIA NIM routes. The actual review step then logsPR is draft; Noema review skipped.No Noema LLM review or authenticated Noema verdict exists. Existing owner handoffContextualWisdomLab/.github#1399carries this exact skip-as-success evidence-semantic canary.ready_for_reviewis a fresh trigger, but skipped-required evidence on this Draft head does not qualify as material review evidence.33299567491, attempt 2, replacement job99265369110: GitHub records terminal SUCCESS after target materialization, trusted-source validation, sidecar/provider preflight, pinnedstrix-agent==1.5.3installation, a real boundedRun Strix (quick), and artifact upload. Artifact9733153727is 11,189 bytes with SHA-256caa35757d3816dfde5db908057812ea1e79a0fba4075acc067de51539fd91542. This mechanical GREEN is not qualifying acquisition-grade Strix evidence:findings.sarifcontains zero results and the console reports zero vulnerabilities, butrun.jsonbinds the scan only to temporary local-code path/tmp/strix-runtime.b33x9e/pr-scopes/strix-pr-scope.AzeJLe, notContextualWisdomLab/Orgmetra, PR feat: add governed performance review packet #44, exact headdbe465d…, or live base9e3e484…;penetration_test_report.mdis generic placeholder prose (Business-level summary for leadership,Frameworks, scope, and approach, etc.). The required gate therefore does not structurally prove that machine-readable and narrative evidence are bound to this exact consumer target. Existing owner handoffContextualWisdomLab/.github#1327already owns the exact-target provenance/fail-closed acceptance contract independently reproduced by other Orgmetra consumers; no duplicate owner lane or Orgmetra shim is created.APPROVEDreview existsRemaining merge gates
This PR is not merge-ready. It remains Draft. On the unchanged exact head, the owned quality/Foundation/Recovery/SAST gates are materially GREEN, but authoritative Dependency Review/Security, an authenticated current-head OpenCode formal verdict, a materially executed Noema review with authoritative verdict, provenance-bound internally consistent Strix evidence, and qualifying independent non-author approval remain unresolved. If this head changes, every applicable gate must be revalidated from zero against that successor head. Queued, pending, skipped-required, cancelled, absent, neutral, failed, stale, predecessor, status-only, fallback-only, contradictory, target-unbound, and model-only evidence is non-passing.
The remaining required-gate failures are foreign-owner control-plane/runtime boundaries. No Orgmetra shim, route override, no-op retrigger commit, gate weakening, predecessor evidence transfer, self-approval, routine administrator bypass, or foreign source/ref/workflow/settings mutation is permitted.
Scope / non-claims
This slice does not persist the authoritative final rating, free-form reviewer feedback, compensation action, Employment/Job records, or authoritative reference-resolution result. It does not autonomously determine a rating or employment action, and it does not replace accountable human confirmation. It does not claim that an immutable audit/outbox, external signing service, legal-compliance determination, certification, or commercial release is already deployed.