Skip to content

docs: record 2026-08-30 hourly loop recheck in gap baseline #1423

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
seonghobae merged 4 commits into from
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

docs: record 2026-08-30 hourly loop recheck in gap baseline #1423

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
989053c
docs: record 2026-08-30 hourly loop recheck in gap baseline
claude Aug 30, 2026
4ac70a7
docs(gaps): correct main-SHA claim and blocker-recovery precision
claude Aug 30, 2026
954d57b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pr1423-local
claude Aug 30, 2026
e4ae24b
Merge branch 'main' into docs/gap-baseline-2026-08-30-cycle-recheck
seonghobae Aug 30, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
92 changes: 58 additions & 34 deletions docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -396,40 +396,64 @@ flowchart LR
or typed provider result. A green event handler that skips the LLM call is not
acceptance evidence.

## 2026-08-30 sidecar pin staleness recurrence

- Same class of defect as the 2026-08-29 entry above recurred within one day:
`scripts/ci/contextual_orchestrator_review_sidecar.sh`'s
`ORCHESTRATOR_PIN_SHA` default (`b21645116b352967e50fc497b87eb745b9cc8c61`)
was already 103 commits behind `contextual-orchestrator` `main`. Observed
directly in hosted `noema-review` job logs (`.github` PR #1421,
`ContextualWisdomLab/contextual-orchestrator` PR #857 and others): the
vendored sidecar's own preflight against the stale pin fails closed with
`gateway preflight returned HTTP 502` (and, on a differently-shaped request,
`request_failed status=413 code=request_too_large`) before the model pool
can run, so `opencode-agent`/Noema never post a verdict and the required
`opencode-review`/`noema-review` checks fail on unrelated PRs across both
repos. Confirmed via `contextual-orchestrator` main history that
`5f2753ace756ddd81049a5221d55e8977572a416` is the current `main` HEAD and
passes its own Tests/Security/Fuzz gates.
- This PR bumps the pin to `5f2753ace756ddd81049a5221d55e8977572a416` in the
three places the contract tests pin it: the sidecar script default,
`tests/test_contextual_orchestrator_review_sidecar_contract.py`'s
`ORCH_PIN_SHA`, and `docs/adr/0003-contextual-orchestrator-vendored-free-zdr.md`'s
"today" reference. `requirements.lock` needs no separate sync — the sidecar
installs it fresh from the freshly-checked-out pinned commit, not from a
copy embedded in this repo.
- Acceptance remains open the same way the 2026-08-29 entry describes: this
fixes the reproduced local preflight failure and all static contract tests
pass, but only a fresh post-merge hosted `noema-review`/`opencode-review`
run against the new pin is proof the live gateway path actually completes
and posts a verdict. Given this is the second staleness incident in as many
days, the underlying gap is process, not just this one value: nothing
currently keeps this pin near `contextual-orchestrator` `main` on an
ongoing basis. A scheduled or CI-triggered pin-freshness check (e.g., fail
a nightly job once the pin falls more than N commits or M days behind a
green `contextual-orchestrator` main) would close that gap; not implemented
in this PR, left for a follow-up.
Comment on lines -399 to -432

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Concurrent incident history overwritten

This replacement drops the 103-commit lag, cross-repository impact, exact replacement pin, and unresolved freshness check. Preserve that durable incident record.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

## 2026-08-30 hourly loop recheck: bootstrap/sidecar-pin cycle still open, one independent fix landed

- Reconfirmed at the start of this hourly pass: protected `main` is
`6c8ee24046d743b3981c566c6e29f99f09137f6a` (this has moved on from the
2026-08-26 107-open-PR snapshot's `826b92394c63deb6981c3a8d16a724d71f85a0d7`
through ordinary merges since; it is not the same commit). #1413 (Strix
`orchestrator/auto` route), #1422 (stale contextual-orchestrator sidecar
pin refresh), and #1414 (bootstrap `if:` guard removal) have not merged
into this current `main`; no human admin bootstrap merge landed this
cycle.
Comment on lines +401 to +408

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: Merge status remains historical

The unmerged status is scoped to the pass start. Later head merges do not invalidate this timestamped observation.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

- Sampled the newest open PRs (#1394, #1398, #1411, #1416, #1417, #1418,
#1419, #1420) against current-head job logs. All of #1411, #1416, #1418,
#1419, and #1420's `strix`/`noema-review`/`opencode-review` failures
reproduce one of the three already-diagnosed systemic causes rather than a
new defect: the Strix `orchestrator/auto` LiteLLM/HTTPS-base rejection
(#1413's fix), the redundant bootstrap `if:` guard tripping
`exact-head-path-policy` (#1414's fix — seen verbatim on #1411 and #1420:
`FAIL: opencode required workflow bootstrap must not depend on
required-workflow event payload fields`), and the stale
`contextual-orchestrator` sidecar pin `b21645116b352967e50fc497b87eb745b9cc8c61`
failing gateway preflight with `request_failed status=413
code=request_too_large` / `sidecar exited before healthz` (#1422's fix —
seen verbatim on #1418). These are three independent fixes, not
interchangeable: the Strix `orchestrator/auto` failure clears only once
#1413 merges; the sidecar-pin failure clears only once #1422 merges; the
bootstrap `if:` guard failure clears once any of #1413, #1414, or #1422
merges (all three carry that fix). A PR failing on more than one signature
needs each corresponding fix on `main`, not just one merge. None of these
failures were reclassified or worked around.
- One independent, non-systemic defect was found and fixed this pass: #1417
("Bolt: label_section 탐색 로직 최적화") added a `ThreadPoolExecutor`-based
`probe_agent` nested closure to
`scripts/ci/contextual_orchestrator_review_launcher.py` without a
docstring, dropping the pinned `interrogate --fail-under 100` gate to
98.8% (`_preflight_review_agents.probe_agent (L174) MISSED`) and failing
#1417's `Hourly cadence, immutable source, NIM credential, and conflict
scope` check independently of the three systemic blockers above. Fixed by
adding a one-line docstring and pushed to #1417's existing head branch
`bolt-opt-label-section-2431233332957705980` (commit `190e505`). Verified
locally: `interrogate` now reports 100.0% over the five pinned files, the
full suite (`1873 passed, 1 skipped, 17 subtests`) and the focused
`opencode_review_normalize_output`/`contextual_orchestrator_review_*`
suites are unaffected, and `compileall`/`git diff --check` pass.
- #1394 (Sentinel SSRF fix touching `sandboxed_web_e2e.py`) and #1418
(Sentinel SSRF/path-traversal regex fix touching
`agent_mention_sweep.py`/`organization_commercial_readiness_loop.py`) were
checked against each other and confirmed **not** duplicates — disjoint
files, disjoint vulnerabilities. #1394 also carries a stale `base` (its
branch predates several recent `main` merges) and needs an ordinary
merge-base-into-head before its checks are meaningful; not attempted this
pass given the time budget.
- No open PR had a qualifying independent `APPROVED` review this pass
(`is:pr is:open review:approved` returned zero results repo-wide), so
priority 4 (merge) had no eligible candidate.
- Next hourly pass: re-check whether #1413/#1414/#1422 merged; if still
open, keep sampling the backlog for independent (non-systemic) defects the
way this pass found #1417's, and consider merging `main` into #1394's head
to get it off its stale base.

## 5. 실행 루프와 고객의 다음 행동

Expand Down
Loading