PEX6 managed 3'-variant not shown

[MUebe]

Hi!
I noticed that in our case 23289, the 3'UTR polymorphism c.*442_445delTAAA is visible in Scout, but not shown on the front page, although we have the variant saved as a managed variant. This is quite alarming, since we may have been dismissing PEX6 heterozygous variants based on the presumed absence of the polymorphism, when it was in fact not flagged.
Can we find out why this is happening (differing nomenclature, wrong annotation in managed variant, ...)?
Thanks in advance!
Malin

[northwestwitch]

Thanks for reporting the issue @MUebe, we'll check and fix ASAP

[dnil]

This one?

I don't see a call for it in the selected VCF-file, certainly not with those coords. Best guess is this is one for DeepVariant, but will check the research file as well.

[dnil]

No not in research. Sry, didn't see you assign @northwestwitch!

[northwestwitch]

No not in research. Sry, didn't see you assign @northwestwitch!

No worries!

[dnil]

And I agree with @MUebe it should be called:

Passing the issue to MIP for further troubleshooting!

[dnil]

No, sorry, this is another kind of issue. It looks like this one has 64% in gnomAD?

I'm sure it was called and caught on the frequency hard filter then.
There is no way something this common could be causative. Are you tracking this for some kind of phenomimic again? We have talked about these kinds of wt alleles before. Ideally they should be handled by an inclusion list directly to MIP, after which we could lower the general hard filter threshold to that of the most common recessive disorder variants.

[MUebe]

This specific variant leads to allelic expression imbalance, meaning that a pathogenic variant on the same allele is expressed more strongly than the other allele. The variant itself is not a causative, but in heterozygous form, it can affect the outcome of a pathogenic variant on the same allele.

[jemten]

The variant get's called by deepvariant but is filtered by MIP due to the popamax AF being at almost 90%. All variants with a AF above 70% gets filtered currently (we're using gnomad AF, swegen AF and gnomad popmax AF). As you say Daniel, having a whitelist would allow us to save these.

[ielvers]

Isn't the point of the managed variant list to act as a whitelist for variants like this? The upstream variant in UGT1A1 is also extremely common but we need to know if it's there, and that one is not filtered out. Have we entered the PEX6 variant wrong in the managed variants list?

[dnil]

The managed variants list acts in Scout, loading all variants available. The variant you describe is so common it is filtered away in the pipeline long before it reaches the loading concern of Scout.

[ielvers]

This particular variant was the reason the AF cutoff was set to 70% so it would appear in Scout (#1963). If it's still filtered out, maybe there's another approach that is better for common but clinically important variants?

[jemten]

If scout has a whitelist we can use that list to ensure that those variants wouldn't get filtered away

[jemten]

Opened a new issue in scout to export the whitelist.