Skip to content

add clickable dest signs#907

Open
Huskydog9988 wants to merge 2 commits into
CivMC:devfrom
Huskydog9988:dest-signs
Open

add clickable dest signs#907
Huskydog9988 wants to merge 2 commits into
CivMC:devfrom
Huskydog9988:dest-signs

Conversation

@Huskydog9988

@Huskydog9988 Huskydog9988 commented Apr 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dest signs are denoted with [DEST] or [DESTINATION] on the first line. A dest sign can have one dest per remain line on the sign. Players can punch the sign to cycle through the available dests. Destinations prefixed with "/dest " will have the prefixed removed automatically.

2026-04-06_12 59 52

fixes: #690

Dest signs are denoted with [DEST] or [DESTINATION] on the first line. A dest sign can have one dest per remain line on the sign. Players can punch the sign to cycle through the available dests. Destinations prefixed with "/dest " will have the prefixed removed automatically.
@Protonull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

imo, it should be [DESTINATIONS] to distinguish it from [dest]/[!dest] junction signs

@okx-code okx-code changed the base branch from main to dev June 19, 2026 22:36

@okx-code okx-code left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree this needs to be clearly distinguished from regular destination signs, like the first line should be [set destination] or something

@Huskydog9988

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I wanted players to be able to use existing dest signs as they already exist, plus I don't feel the ambiguity is all that detrimental. I also think that just having a single "railswitch" sign is easier to understand then having multiple different kinds that end up just looking the same.

@Protonull

Protonull commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For what it's worth, I went with [set destination] for ClickDest which definitely no one uses since it's illegal. I could've gone with [dest] as you've done, it would give a layer of plausible deniability, but I do think gives a confusing dual purpose to those signs. I cannot read your mind, but I assume it's the same reason as why [!dest] signs aren't also supported in this PR despite having the exact same purpose (just a different redstone output).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clickable /dest signs

3 participants