Self-acceptance wave-1: post-deploy live probe of the published site, auto-file defect issue on failure

[loning]

github-devloop implementation PR for issue #11

[loning]

github-devloop implementation PR for issue #11

[loning]

github-devloop PR is ready for review

[loning]

github-devloop PR review decision: reject
三方裁决: minimal=reject structural=reject delete=reject

minimal:
The PR should not advance as-is because it implements two probe surfaces at once: a post-deploy pages.yml shell probe and a new site-board probe_scan department, which is unnecessary scope for the minimal approved wave-1 and leaves unclear which path owns acceptance semantics; I would approve a narrower PR that picks one existing execution surface, removes the duplicate runtime department or CI probe, pins one log/failure contract, and shows scripts/run.sh test plus scripts/run.sh check evidence.

structural:
The PR does not preserve reliable data flow: probe_scan treats mixed network errors plus 200s as overall ok instead of failure, while pages.yml has a separate duplicated probe implementation with different empty-manifest and failure behavior; this creates two contracts for the same probe and one of them can silently pass a broken sweep.

delete:
The PR keeps too much surface for wave-1 by implementing the probe twice, as an inline GitHub Actions shell step and as a new site-board runtime department on board_poll_tick; pick the single existing CI probe path and delete the Lua department/board fanout changes until scheduled runtime probing is proven necessary.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop fix pushed for re-review

Previous reviewed head: 7cf24d1
New head: 5ed768d

[loning]

github-devloop PR review decision: reject
三方裁决: minimal=reject structural=reject delete=approve

minimal:
The PR is small and correctly drops issue filing, but it is not merge-ready because the probe logic is embedded untested in .github/workflows/pages.yml and changes the very workflow file the issue told implementers not to touch; approve after scoping this explicitly as the chosen CI surface and adding evidence for the three required cases: all-200 ok log, partial failure fail log/exit, and all-network-error skip.

structural:
The PR preserves the manifest boundary and keeps the probe read-only, but it is not merge-ready structurally because the live-probe contract is embedded as untested shell in pages.yml with no timeout and no automated coverage for ok/fail/all-network-error classification, so the reliability semantics are not maintainable or verifiable as a contract.

delete:
The PR deletes the risky parts of the original scope: no new scheduled package, no dedup state, and no GitHub issue mutation; it only adds a manifest-driven post-deploy read-only probe with greppable ok/fail/skip logs, which is small enough surface to prove the acceptance signal before adding automation.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop fix pushed for re-review

Previous reviewed head: 5ed768d
New head: 74b2751

[loning]

github-devloop PR review convergence round 0 — 三方未达成共识，收窄中

收窄问题: Should the post-deploy probe consume the deploy step's published page_url instead of hard-coding https://chronoaiproject.github.io/fkst-website, and is that merge-blocking for PR #12?

三方立场:

• minimal: approve — The PR matches the narrowed minimal scope: it uses the existing Pages workflow, adds a tracked manifest and read-only probe logs, and avoids the unproven scheduled package, dedup state, and GitHub issue creation surface; merge readiness would change to reject if live runs show deploy-propagation flakiness from the immediate post-deploy curl step.
• structural: reject — The PR narrows to CI probe logs, which is structurally acceptable in direction, but it should not advance as-is because .github/workflows/pages.yml hard-codes https://chronoaiproject.github.io/fkst-website instead of consuming the deploy step’s published page_url, making the probe contract drift from the actual deploy output and brittle under custom-domain or repo/path changes.
• delete: approve — PR Self-acceptance wave-1: post-deploy live probe of the published site, auto-file defect issue on failure #12 is merge-ready from the delete angle because it implements the reduced acceptance loop only: tracked manifest, post-deploy read-only probe, greppable ok/fail/skip logs, and tests, while deleting the brittle scheduled package, dedup state, and GitHub issue-creation surface from the original scope.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop PR review convergence round 0 — 三方未达成共识，收窄中

收窄问题: whether the post-deploy live probe’s immediate curl behavior needs bounded retry/backoff to avoid GitHub Pages propagation false failures before merge

三方立场:

• minimal: reject — Minimal scope is close, but not merge-ready because the post-deploy probe is a one-shot curl immediately after actions/deploy-pages, so normal Pages propagation delay can create false failures; approve after adding a small bounded retry/backoff or showing evidence that the deployed URLs are consistently fresh at probe time, while keeping the current no-issue-filing scope.
• structural: approve — The PR preserves the narrowed structural boundary: the post-deploy probe is a manifest-driven CI step, keeps published-site observation read-only, emits small greppable status data, fails closed for all-path network loss, and avoids premature GitHub mutation/dedup state; the only minor contract wart is README wording that attaches the probe to site-board even though the execution surface is the Pages workflow, but that is not enough to block merge.
• delete: approve — The PR advances the reduced scope I want: it deletes the proposed scheduled package, dedup state, and GitHub issue mutation surface, leaving only a manifest-driven post-deploy probe in existing Pages CI with bounded curl behavior, greppable ok/fail/skip logs, and focused tests.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop PR review decision: approve
三方裁决: minimal=approve structural=approve delete=approve

minimal:
PR #12 matches the narrowed minimal scope: manifest-driven post-deploy live probing with greppable ok/fail/skip logs, no scheduled package, no dedup state, and no GitHub mutation surface; merge-readiness should still require the existing scripts/run.sh check evidence, but the diff is appropriately small for wave-1.

structural:
The PR preserves the narrowed structural contract: the post-deploy probe is an explicit GitHub Pages workflow step, uses a tracked site/probe-manifest as the single page-scope source, keeps data flow read-only with small greppable ok/fail/skip records, and avoids premature GitHub mutation/dedup state while still failing the deploy job on real non-200 published paths.

delete:
Current PR is merge-ready from the delete angle because it removes the overbuilt scheduled package, dedup state, and GitHub issue creation surface, leaving only a manifest-driven post-deploy probe with greppable ok/fail/skip logs and focused tests.

⟦AI:FKST⟧

[loning]

github-devloop is merging PR #12

[loning]

github-devloop merged PR #12