OCP 7.9

[adam-urbanczyk]

Updates for OCP 7.9 compatibility.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 96.17%. Comparing base (fea85a5) to head (b6a3dcb).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cadquery/occ_impl/shapes.py	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
cadquery/cqgi.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1946      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.77%   96.17%   +0.40%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        7856     8635     +779     
  Branches     1183     1376     +193     
==========================================
+ Hits         7524     8305     +781     
- Misses        192      193       +1     
+ Partials      140      137       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[adam-urbanczyk]

Despite my fix 7.9 fails on cqgi and python 14. Seems to work on earlier ones.

[Oblynx]

Hey @adam-urbanczyk I just tested this on our internal test suite, which isn't using OCP 7.9-specific features. The upgrade went well and all the tests passed. Python 3.11.

[adam-urbanczyk]

Thanks @Oblynx , the remaining issue is 3.14 and cqgi specific.

BTW: would you be willing to describe your use case?

[Oblynx]

We are using cadquery as a lightweight and LLM friendly CAD scripting language in our engineering platform 🫶

[greyltc]

Despite my fix 7.9 fails on cqgi and python 14. Seems to work on earlier ones.

@adam-urbanczyk maybe that cqgi failure is this: #1976 nevermind, I didn't see fc85e1d!