Skip to content

Heaving-WMT decomposition V1#620

Open
Hangyum wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
Hangyu-heaving-WMT-decomposition
Open

Heaving-WMT decomposition V1#620
Hangyum wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
Hangyu-heaving-WMT-decomposition

Conversation

@Hangyum

@Hangyum Hangyum commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This notebook is to decompose variable changes (e.g., temperature, salinity, age tracer) into changes along isopyncals (water mass transformation) and isopycnal heaving. I used xgcm to do depth-density coordinate transfers and calculate the changes along isopycnals. After that, I transfer this change back to the depth coordinate. The residual term (total change minus change along the isopycnal) is referred to as the change due to isopycnal heaving.

@review-notebook-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@Hangyum Hangyum self-assigned this Sep 9, 2025
@edoddridge edoddridge self-requested a review September 9, 2025 02:14
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
Comment thread 03-Mains/Heaving_Water_mass_transformation_decomposition.ipynb
@Hangyum

Hangyum commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I just added a new commit!

@@ -0,0 +1,1863 @@
{

@edoddridge edoddridge Sep 16, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new function name is much clearer, thanks!

I should have mentioned this in the first review, but it is generally better to include required variables in the function call, rather than relying on them as global variables. In this case, the function needs start_time, end_time, lat_slice, and lon, but none of them are included in the function call.


Reply via ReviewNB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants